Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.079 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.00; 'binary': 0.07; 'dropdown': 0.09; 'editor.': 0.09; 'subject:features': 0.09; 'subtle': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'windows,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'navigation': 0.16; 'tabs': 0.16; 'usable': 0.16; 'files.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(not': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'basically': 0.19; '(the': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'keyboard': 0.24; 'of.': 0.24; 'replace': 0.24; 'text.': 0.24; 'helpful': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'feature': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'fast.': 0.31; 'really,': 0.31; 'though.': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'open': 0.33; 'linux': 0.33; 'are:': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; "can't": 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'editor': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'earth': 0.36; 'like,': 0.36; 'paypal,': 0.36; 'shows': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'list,': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'support,': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'commands': 0.60; 'dave': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'july': 0.63; 'choose': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'purchase': 0.65; 'subject:Important': 0.65; 'between': 0.67; 'rendering': 0.68; 'power': 0.76; 'faster.': 0.84; 'have?': 0.84; 'phoenix,': 0.84; 'researching': 0.84; 'sublime': 0.84; 'visually': 0.84; 'choice.': 0.93; 'tomorrow': 0.95; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3CrzRsFEwvDzaiPMtZ0Svv+R1rQTfSbMYTV5cuDa6vs=; b=fzWFsfTdtAms9PWVSZ70KDq5IhHPp5Qe9xDffJ+tDldvEfGVXvKaZ1PurtcBYHtO39 F6B1XvudwiIJWG6QzQXwzvHaPBHAFrl0hE2LdjdYFpABO8AwhFEmzkZMh+QBmsB0ZJX8 FStjAfJuahzOLQI1h76Jnrq93a1HSEcDeTMc6xtZNpfE4qM9xey7HCXoLh28hD6wF9pK 5k/6VxpE8/dGJJBF3Q1ltHys7YuiixVsk4G9+gYNFGCoRTQogruFGAHH/V2Hj4+0UN6i VQV05zSnwetwvgciUCkkCf2JE0Jmv9AJw6c15gCftElQpoA5OugNmG8Bl9R+a4lDnQt1 TWiw== X-Received: by 10.152.45.65 with SMTP id k1mr3870253lam.78.1372984730447; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:38:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0eab9d68-da63-41b0-bad4-d7b4457128ce@googlegroups.com> References: <0eab9d68-da63-41b0-bad4-d7b4457128ce@googlegroups.com> From: Joshua Landau Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 01:38:10 +0100 Subject: Re: Important features for editors To: cutems93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 59 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1372984732 news.xs4all.nl 15882 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52905 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:49911 On 4 July 2013 08:32, cutems93 wrote: > I am researching on editors for my own reference. I found that each of th= em has some features that other don't, but I am not sure which features are= significant/necessary for a GOOD editor. What features do you a good edito= r should have? Keyboard shortcuts? Extensions? Let me give you some reasons I really, really like Sublime Text. * Fast. Like, really fast. I've used Vim -- Sublime Text is faster. Considering I'm on a middle-end 5-year-old computer (not for long...) this matters. * The rendering is gorgeous. There are subtle shadows, there's perfectly crisp text (the main reason I no longer use terminal editors, actually), and once you choose the right theme (Nexus and Phoenix, Tomorrow Night for me) it's just lovely. There's this feature where it shows you tabs -- but only for the part of the file you're on. There's, instead of a scrollbar, a little "bird's-eye-view" of the whole code on the RHS. This goes on. Visually it is stunning, in a helpful way. If it had proper terminal-emulation support, I'd replace my terminal with it. It's just that usable an interface. * Multiple cursors. This is something that no-one else really advertises, but it's one of the most used features for me. It's something you just have to try for a while -- I think it's a bit like Vim's power-of-Regex but easy for a, you know, human. (I just found https://github.com/terryma/vim-multiple-cursors). * Good navigation between and inside of files. A lot of things have this, so I won't say much more. * The "Command Palette" is a dropdown that you do commands from, and because of the way you search it, it's like a hybrid between vim's command-based power and something that's actually discoverable and easy. * Usable on *really big* files, and has one of the best binary-file support I know of. I open binary file a little more than I should, not that I can do much with them. * Useful extensions, installable at a button-press -- in[search for package]. Like SublimeREPL. I know Emacs/Vim will do better at REPLs, but few others will. * Etc. This goes on. Looking at Dave Angel's list, Sublime Text pretty-much aces it. What I don't understand is where he says: > The main negatives I can see are: ... > It's available for OS/X, Linux and Windows, with a single purchase > The eval/demo is not time-limited (currently) How on earth are those negatives? He basically only dislikes it because you have to use PayPal, which is his choice. I can't say I agree with it though.