Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'seemed': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; '>>>>': 0.09; 'folder,': 0.09; 'presume': 0.09; 'second.': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'case.': 0.15; 'although,': 0.16; 'dll,': 0.16; 'dll.': 0.16; 'exe': 0.16; 'first),': 0.16; 'registry.': 0.16; 'replaces': 0.16; 'retrieves': 0.16; 'subject:Which': 0.16; 'uninstall': 0.16; 'url:all': 0.16; 'url:documentation': 0.16; 'weird.': 0.16; 'what?': 0.16; 'looked': 0.16; 'received:74.125.82.44': 0.16; 'received:mail- ww0-f44.google.com': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.17; '<>.': 0.17; 'wed,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'help.': 0.19; 'insert': 0.19; 'slightly': 0.19; 'seems': 0.20; "haven't": 0.20; 'dec': 0.22; "doesn't": 0.22; 'feb': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'incorrect': 0.23; 'replacing': 0.23; 'somehow': 0.23; 'noticed': 0.24; 'command': 0.24; 'aug': 0.24; 'guess': 0.26; 'helpful': 0.26; "i'm": 0.26; 'fix': 0.27; 'scanned': 0.28; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'error': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'correct': 0.29; 'lines': 0.30; 'seem': 0.30; 'cmd': 0.30; 'hurt': 0.30; 'kelly': 0.30; 'microsoft,': 0.30; 'installed': 0.31; "didn't": 0.31; "i'll": 0.31; 'version': 0.32; 'certainly': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.34; 'it.': 0.34; 'checking': 0.34; 'file.': 0.34; 'message.': 0.34; 'dll': 0.34; 'yet,': 0.34; 'review,': 0.35; 'received:74.125.82': 0.35; 'window': 0.35; 'however,': 0.36; 'file': 0.36; 'url:windows': 0.36; 'question': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'run': 0.37; 'corner': 0.37; 'received:74.125': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; "there's": 0.37; 'another': 0.37; 'problems': 0.37; 'replace': 0.38; 'went': 0.38; "i'd": 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'should': 0.39; 'tool': 0.39; 'missing': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'url:microsoft': 0.40; 'entered': 0.40; 'one,': 0.40; 'download': 0.60; 'more': 0.61; '2011': 0.61; 'provided': 0.62; 'back': 0.62; 'took': 0.63; 'link': 0.63; 'believe': 0.65; 'asap': 0.67; 'download.': 0.67; 'restore': 0.68; 'url:en-us': 0.71; 'market.': 0.74; 'buying': 0.79; 'purchase': 0.84; '10:04': 0.84; '2003.': 0.84; 'choices.': 0.84; 'dilemma.': 0.84; 'run?': 0.84; 'something.': 0.84; 'whatever,': 0.84; 'does?': 0.91; 'checker': 0.93; 'url:resources': 0.93; 'url:true': 0.93; 'grey': 0.96 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:02:21 -0500 Subject: Re: Which libraries for Python 2.5.2 From: Benjamin Kaplan To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mpv1.tis.cwru.edu) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 77 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1325131412 news.xs4all.nl 6850 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35776 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:18156 On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:04 PM, W. eWatson wrote: > On 12/28/2011 12:55 PM, W. eWatson wrote: >> >> On 12/28/2011 9:37 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:33 AM, W. eWatson >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Well, thing went slightly awry. The link gave me two choices. Download >>>> msv...dll fixer, and download fixer. I took the latter. However, just >>>> checking on the other one, found that I got the same exe file. I >>>> installed >>>> it on the XP PC, and pressed what looked like a reasonable place to >>>> start. >>>> It would download the dll, and register it. >>>> >>>> Well, it seemed more interested in the registry. It scanned four >>>> areas of >>>> the registry, and found 123 problems in total. To fix them would require >>>> buying something. >>>> >>>> I noticed a large button near the top that said download dll. It >>>> found one >>>> the internet, and guess what? More purchase for the download. >>>> >>>> It seems like dll-fixer has a corner on the market. >>> >>> >>> Definitely don't download that spamware fixer program -- who knows >>> what that does? You want the grey "Download zip-file" link, not the >>> not the flashy "Download fixer" ad links. Anyway, it sounds like >>> you've found another copy of the DLL. >>> >>> If I were you, I would uninstall that fixer ASAP and then run an >>> anti-malware and anti-virus tool or two, just in case. >>> >>>> Run the sfc /scannow System File Checker command to replace a missing or >>>> corrupt copy of the msvcp71.dll file. If this DLL file is provided my >>>> Microsoft, the System File Checker tool should restore it. >>> >>> >>> I don't believe it is provided by Microsoft, but it wouldn't hurt to try. >>> >>>> A new dilemma. The PC XP in question with Python has the the msvcp71.dll >>>> file in System32. The one I took off my other laptop has a slightly >>>> newer >>>> one. Feb 2003 vs Aug 2003. >>> >>> >>> Weird. Try registering the existing dll, try replacing it with the >>> other one (be sure to back up the original first), etc. >> >> >> I haven't installed the newer version yet, Aug 2003. I thought I'd see >> what happened if I entered sfc /scannow. Whatever, happened the black >> window flashed by in a split second. >> >> Somehow this doesn't seem helpful >> >> . >> Although, 20 lines down or so it says: >> If sfc discovers that a protected file has been overwritten, it >> retrieves the correct version of the file from the >> %systemroot%\system32\dllcache folder, and then replaces the incorrect >> file. >> >> I'm going to run this by a XP NG. >> >> > That certainly didn't help. > > I'm going to save the msvcp71.dll from the Python laptop somewhere, then > insert the one from my other XP laptop. Finally, I'll register it. regsvr32. > Just to review, I presume not from cmd, but Run? It should work from either but I prefer to use cmd in case there's an error message.