Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.04; 'subject:based': 0.07; 'braces': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.13; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.13; '(),': 0.16; 'curly': 0.16; 'delimit': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:syntax': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'dec': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code': 0.25; 'code.': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; '27,': 0.29; 'true,': 0.29; 'for,': 0.30; 'does': 0.32; 'certainly': 0.32; 'tue,': 0.32; 'pretty': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; '(including': 0.34; 'round': 0.34; 'changing': 0.35; 'here,': 0.35; 'subject:/': 0.35; 'skip:" 10': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'called': 0.40; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; '2011': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'subject': 0.62; 'prevalent': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+4DnsGbajf6ybqg8NzQ2UmKu/ExL2hTfuvgP0TCY0LM=; b=ndmQSEcsF078HUJhpM90emHrVkcMMMvRubz+gyTk7fBJhOh1VM+Rqqf1Uyj0U5fe5M sm9ytWCXSUaMhnVz8Jb2QvhyReGYgkzl/efOyieVzMeOAGZIX6GzEm10T4hwUK41TPFB F1aqrXQ1DrUwt2Xi0sOPV5GqfDZzFIoX45lVs= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6f5a3dba-bb7e-44df-8c8f-a0d56441d807@i8g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> References: <841f4d29-f50b-4b0b-912b-b497fb6e60ec@t16g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <4ef32cd9$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4ef71ae2$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2a248812-d0ea-424a-93f0-0f496d130414@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <4ef74c1d$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <6f5a3dba-bb7e-44df-8c8f-a0d56441d807@i8g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:01:34 +1100 Subject: Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1324933297 news.xs4all.nl 6851 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39450 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:17980 On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Eelco wrote: > Now try it without changing the subject from round braces to > everything but round braces. Around here, the term "braces" means the curly ones - { and } - that delimit blocks of code in C, and dictionaries/sets in Python. "Brackets" may be what you're looking for, if you mean all of ()[]{}. Or if you just mean (), they're called "parentheses". If your point is that parens are used more often than packing/unpacking, that's almost certainly true, since function calls (including method invocations) are so prevalent in pretty much any code. But what does that prove? ChrisA