Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'operator': 0.03; 'syntax': 0.04; 'true,': 0.05; '(using': 0.07; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'oh,': 0.09; 'statements': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '""")': 0.16; '"),': 0.16; '"enter': 0.16; '"while"': 0.16; "(i'm": 0.16; '*any*': 0.16; '10:59': 0.16; 'abusing': 0.16; 'assignments': 0.16; 'false:': 0.16; 'inputs': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'lambda:': 0.16; 'rationale': 0.16; 'redundant': 0.16; 'subject:simple': 0.16; 'true:': 0.16; 'worse.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'library': 0.18; "python's": 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'bonus': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'on,': 0.29; 'points': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'evil': 0.31; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'yield': 0.36; 'so,': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'expressed': 0.37; 'skip:[ 10': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'simple,': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'break': 0.61; 'name:': 0.61; 'name': 0.63; 'july': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'deals': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'jul': 0.74; 'beautiful,': 0.84; 'good!': 0.84; 'partial': 0.84; 'valid)': 0.84; 'this!': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=FWF1UV3BbKL/6EYWSEdCwZAHNFjAX2VPdBLU4+pJnCs=; b=lIR5bbUywOh6ZQEH3WwsWeGbOif2Oosulq8Pizm4as4YpYQrCQX84TnMfyPQIYJM4I m9VmMbzwvbjSjUYl5JXX4po5XqQrICfLusxz8qAc5g2HK8ReQdCwCmVjPftwWE3SyeHf qDtUN8zjdqrv+V19td+KQ+EY+9pKl0es4sclgBxTHBPdd03boV+tt/I8rkWTIQ5iAH+k wBb+K9YGOVtOX1TwY1wfOB0JfKR2dvMKv9ta9lAMMw/xxW5ePQ4oVSRrPRswEwqZE0Eu Ac1U8B1Moim4VB5kg7vE2eh/RjLk3cTP3VCVngws8/rqxSBMTVfHpvDIMQcjaYKMMmLS MXog== X-Received: by 10.112.182.39 with SMTP id eb7mr11968484lbc.30.1372696286757; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Joshua Landau Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:30:46 +0100 Subject: Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code To: Chris Angelico Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 114 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1372696293 news.xs4all.nl 15910 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41949 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:49571 On 1 July 2013 14:14, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote: >> On 2013-06-30, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, >>> and write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way >>> to achieve the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing >>> Python's clean syntax in the process. >>> >>> Go on, do your worst! >> >> I've often thought it was redundant for Python to support 'if' >> when it has dictionaries, cf the rationale for having no >> 'switch'. >> >> valid_name = None >> while not valid_name: >> name = input("Enter your name: ") >> valid_name = { >> True: lambda: print("No name longer than 20 letters."), >> False: lambda: True, >> }[len(name) > 20]() >> >> Much better. > > Good! Good! But, waaaah. Waaaah. > > def get_name(): > while True: > name = input("Enter your name: ") > yield { > True: lambda: print("No name longer than 20 letters."), > False: lambda: name, > }[len(name) > 20]() > name = next(filter(None,get_name())) Oh, cruel. But you can do worse. Who needs "while" when you have filter(iter(FUNCTION, object()))? def get_name(): name = input("Enter your name: ") return [ lambda: name, lambda: print("No name longer than 20 letters."), ][len(name) > 20]() name = next(filter(None, iter(get_name, object()))) But who needs *any* of this! Defining functions is so old-hat. It's all already in the standard library (using only assignments and function-calls): from functools import partial from operator import getitem, ge, methodcaller from itertools import compress, tee apply = methodcaller("__call__") ret_true = partial(getitem, [True], 0) print_invalid = partial(print, "No name longer than 20 letters.") inputs = iter(partial(input, "Enter your name: "), ...) inputs, valid = tee(inputs) valid = map(len, valid) valid = map(partial(ge, 20), valid) side_effect_valid = map(partial(getitem, [print_invalid, ret_true]), valid) side_effect_valid = map(apply, side_effect_valid) valid_inputs = compress(inputs, side_effect_valid) name = next(valid_inputs) Which can be "neatly" expressed as two statements (I'm struggling to got it to one without those evil lambdas): from functools import partial from operator import getitem, ge, methodcaller from itertools import compress, tee inputs, valid = tee(iter(partial(input, "Enter your name: "), ...)) name = next( compress( inputs, map( methodcaller("__call__"), map( partial( getitem, [ partial(print, "No name longer than 20 letters."), partial(getitem, [True], 0) ] ), map( partial(ge, 20), map(len, valid) ) ) ) ) ) Beautiful, see? Of course, the most powerful function deals with this much more quickly: exec(""" while True: name = input("Enter your name: ") if len(name) <= 20: break else: print("No name longer than 20 letters.") """)