Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.04; 'permitted': 0.07; 'dan': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:trying': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'tcp,': 0.16; 'udp,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'subject:] ': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "haven't": 0.24; 'switch': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'dec': 0.30; 'layer': 0.31; "can't": 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'done': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; '12,': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'deals': 0.65; 'fragment': 0.84; 'received:myvzw.com': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Dave Angel Subject: Re: [newbie] trying socket as a replacement for nc Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:52:59 -0500 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 39.sub-70-208-132.myvzw.com In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Groundhog Newsreader for Android X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1386895925 news.xs4all.nl 2862 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51200 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:61778 On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:27:16 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: > I haven't done a lot of UDP, but are you pretty sure UDP can't at > least fragment large packets? What's a router or switch to do if the > Path MTU isn't large enough for an original packet? A router doesn't talk udp or tcp, it deals with ip packets, which it IS permitted to fragment. Conversely the udp layer in the os doesn't care about MTU. -- DaveA