Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Michael Torrie Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: GitHub's =?windows-1252?Q?=93pull_request=94_is_propri?= =?windows-1252?Q?etary_lock-in?= Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:16:17 -0700 Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <87si2hdoq3.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <8560zcsbuu.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <56889608.50504@gmail.com> <85poxjqnlj.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 4eGi0TYA0g4hQ5VqBuo8AgKkNbpIUw48oJosY+ZrzbUA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.017 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'lines.': 0.07; 'comment,': 0.09; 'non-ascii': 0.09; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'mangled': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:lock': 0.16; 'threading': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'versions': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'least': 0.27; 'header,': 0.29; 'too.': 0.30; 'noticed': 0.32; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'quite': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'future': 0.60; 'avoid': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'subject': 0.70 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:101229 On 01/03/2016 05:51 PM, Random832 wrote: > Just as a general comment, I note there are now at least four mangled > versions of this subject header, and threading is already fragile enough > on this list. I think in the future it would be best to avoid non-ASCII > characters in subject lines. I noticed this too. Though threading based on message-id is working quite well, as designed!