Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'arguments': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'backwards': 0.09; 'cursor': 0.09; 'editor.': 0.09; 'macros': 0.09; 'python:': 0.09; 'scripting': 0.09; 'subject:still': 0.09; 'gui': 0.11; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'hire': 0.15; "'c'": 0.16; ':-).': 0.16; 'anyway).': 0.16; 'clunky': 0.16; 'command,': 0.16; 'folding': 0.16; 'hacks': 0.16; 'hits': 0.16; 'knock': 0.16; 'language)': 0.16; 'mappings,': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'odd': 0.17; 'subject:need': 0.17; 'followed': 0.20; 'hours,': 0.22; 'work,': 0.22; 'seems': 0.23; 'command': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; '(which': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'implemented': 0.27; '(as': 0.27; 'lines': 0.28; 'run': 0.28; '(maybe': 0.29; 'key,': 0.29; 'microsoft,': 0.29; 'case,': 0.29; 'integration': 0.29; 'words': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'google,': 0.32; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'typically': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; "can't": 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'needed': 0.35; 'companies.': 0.35; 'said,': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'michael': 0.36; 'anything': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'ones': 0.37; 'subject:New': 0.37; 'well.': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'delete': 0.38; 'instead': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'companies': 0.60; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'facebook': 0.61; 'leaving': 0.62; 'letters': 0.62; 'between': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'great': 0.64; 'benefit': 0.70; 'sweet': 0.71; 'million': 0.72; 'completion': 0.78; 'productivity': 0.78; 'counts': 0.81; 'daily,': 0.84; 'ibm,': 0.84; 'slowed': 0.84; 'subject:good': 0.84; 'terrible': 0.84 Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:48:45 -0500 From: Mitya Sirenef User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: New to python, do I need an IDE or is vim still good enough? References: <50e25c10$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <50E32E58.3000102@lightbird.net> <50E4A7A2.4010104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50E4A7A2.4010104@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 53 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1357166930 news.xs4all.nl 6868 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39261 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:36014 On 01/02/2013 04:33 PM, Michael Torrie wrote: > On 01/01/2013 11:43 AM, Mitya Sirenef wrote: >> Therefore, deleting 3 WORDs is 3daW (mnemonic: del a WORD 3 times). > > Interesting. I typically use just d3w. 3daW seems to delete 3 lines > for me, the same result as d3. Another favorite command is d or > c followed by a number and then the right arrow key, for manipulating > letters instead of words. d3w is a different command, it means delete 3 words *ahead* from cursor. e.g.: func() lst[] lst2[ind] foo bar Now put the cursor on letter 'c' (4th from beginning) and use the command 3daW, it should delete the 3 WORDs, leaving just the 'foo bar'. > > > In any case, I can be way more productive with just a few commands > (maybe 3 or 4 commands or concepts) in Vim than in almost any GUI > editor. In my experience, Vim users almost always find this to be true > for them as well. Vim really hits the sweet spot for productivity and > usability. The only thing about Vim that I find clunky is how code > folding macros work, and also code completion hacks (which I have never > needed anyway). Vim does have a lot of flaws, alas. The highest ones on my list is that python integration (as a scripting language) is wonky; python can't be run alongside Vim process; double-escaping is terrible (stuff like \blah); process of development is slowed down too much by over-emphasis on backwards compatibility; the way arguments and counts are implemented between mappings, commands and functions is byzantine and way overcomplicated.. That said, Vim is still 1k% better than emacs and 3k% better than anything else :-). It's really odd that large companies like google, microsoft, ibm, facebook don't all chip in to give Bram a few million to hire a few people and knock the Vim out into the stratosphere, given how much these companies' employees used Vim for many hours, daily, to great benefit for said companies. Oh well. -m -- Lark's Tongue Guide to Python: http://lightbird.net/larks/