Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: No SQLite newsgroup, so I'll ask here about SQLite, python and MS Access
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 02:12:57 +0000
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <mailman.396.1462414390.32212.python-list@python.org>
References: <ngdtu5$sa8$1@dont-email.me> <CAGgTfkP2=L7R_hsRR6dc1qtsKd=6H56WtVQP6oQdahmxaSpr0g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de Tg+fdDiWlMFJuvGKHpdOvQKEva7riTIFyIQihM+Hot4Q==
Return-Path: <michael.selik@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'backwards': 0.09; 'driver,': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.14; 'wed,': 0.15; '(via': 0.16; 'bugs.': 0.16; 'crashes': 0.16; 'dfs': 0.16; 'readable': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'sqlite3': 0.16; 'vbscript,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.16; 'to:2**1': 0.21; 'saying': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'tried': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'staying': 0.29; 'subject:Access': 0.29; 'open': 0.33; 'file': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'sometimes': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'created': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'linked': 0.63; 'surprise': 0.72; 'subject:here': 0.84; 'hand,': 0.97
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=B3+AIFf1xq6+hbE0Wg6L4OrzETPza60c+pcHDH7S6vg=; b=nRNTv1yzOGqn2scxuSBBwFUy+/JFw7FiVQHmzVt2MWzO+m6/amGgQpq8ADDiLvHsqW K65NQeOlFMc1Z34Y7kWNe8GXR4T1zk0Ls42oUgw06zh8x+semX1E1gYEb/sC+egdAE/1 Kj62IitWudQV2NPQkzF4tRHGfzlamB024UZtixjp4E78mYg1FUXV9HHN0yVPaVFSRRAd xAofFGZuas3fWp3gbmTvVPaLOgBGv4Tpx/JC1nPv1X+WnPADrXrByOgfjucKGy3b8srU 6lhVkhF6gZOjOvqKNpSkvN5iZwS4mFihJ0Qs/x1MxgQtPRRyQx5r0hr4H+8XRuCqiHkr ckXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=B3+AIFf1xq6+hbE0Wg6L4OrzETPza60c+pcHDH7S6vg=; b=Gmk1TwXARvI1DAhJRl4QjmeX61zk8k037d7eOtTW/sX0dl+zCg/So6FNtTSa98O5QS FoMZIi71yc1pQ/xoMDei4jwHONbLR/8jeZZEiXwIYvPiRiMbB9eRVKojOq+INupRHAxU Ee/96+MqWcNObh50SrQWiH0OSKKb47jT/YT8iROpYsWHrcMMud1g13GEAE3+EUh+EBJq pnorbOPjbwrGsQ0P2zPgG1LyWgpnKkebIMPx52qtewYli5hq3B+KUenxvkDFaf9qaKqT JM+M/EnHBz0pCVK0chq+MAq0F8fJv8sdw2lOmhbBcwUifVKKcdt1dKGcAv3j93DM83+U XMhA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX8uxrp2r33ahYLpQewckLZFsQrr31yYIKlljvyOS8YWsyNvBpJiK+5cjThcxWXNCDU9Kipa08N6gZAkg==
X-Received: by 10.140.173.85 with SMTP id t82mr12529678qht.10.1462414387297; Wed, 04 May 2016 19:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ngdtu5$sa8$1@dont-email.me>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <CAGgTfkP2=L7R_hsRR6dc1qtsKd=6H56WtVQP6oQdahmxaSpr0g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References: <ngdtu5$sa8$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:108157

On Wed, May 4, 2016, 6:51 PM DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

> Both of the following python commands successfully create a SQLite3
> datafile which crashes Access 2003 immediately upon trying to open it
> (via an ODBC linked table).
>

Have you tried using Access 2013?

On the other hand, a SQLite3 file created in VBScript, using the same
> ODBC driver, /is/ readable with Access 2003


Microsoft is pretty intense about backwards compatibility, sometimes even
staying compatibile with old bugs. Not saying that's the case here, but it
wouldn't surprise me.

>