Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.073 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.01; 'cpython': 0.05; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'subject:module': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'windows': 0.15; 'limiting.': 0.16; 'subject:argparse': 0.16; 'obviously': 0.18; 'ticket': 0.19; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'url:bugs': 0.29; 'patch': 0.29; 'url:python': 0.33; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'everyone.': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; "couldn't": 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'behavior': 0.77; '3.4': 0.84; '9.1': 0.84; 'freebsd': 0.84; 'responses': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mEwqw4L2T1bPHHzRpjBaGrb7E3upDnul/J9JZjOo8C4=; b=IUOAHcZYc3w7jRFrU7kDJawbzxtI03HJ8R+YIY1arn8GUf8LAB8us2gkDQGCrfU8IF x3Df2rE4kS0iuENqe4B40ZSbfFSsAG8o2dDSWY3f7M9pQAQz3RKC4eOPMWEKv6Hx1HHy ANIxrdyaej7OAOSGSnZrYAjP16SIWk6yjmMgqrC2lg10XtRYW85wucgSOki0KcX1Zg2z 3mH9lUl+8LOt5jZr+7J/DUioeWgDzMPvN71nb8KiLCET5ECTiDEbdnYYZqzBMz+n0pPB Aibn3gOKnxC+67uHjdh92bWCnTN65LKbq8vMGK1UbKE/jX8Ell4ZnXTGTtTbJInb3WW1 98Jw== X-Received: by 10.50.164.197 with SMTP id ys5mr2048732igb.3.1372394250237; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 23:36:46 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Why is the argparse module so inflexible? References: <51CC897E.5000702@stoneleaf.us> <20130627230213.GA22992@cskk.homeip.net> <20130627192221.19949fa6@bigbox.christie.dr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 7 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1372394253 news.xs4all.nl 15976 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59528 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:49361 I appreciate the responses from everyone. I knew I couldn't be the only who thought this behavior was unnecessarily limiting. I found a ticket on the bug tracker. A patch was even submitted, but obviously it didn't make it into 3.3. Hopefully, it will make it into 3.4 with some prodding. http://bugs.python.org/issue9938 -- CPython 3.3.2 | Windows NT 6.2.9200 / FreeBSD 9.1