Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: UNSURE 0.207 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.59; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.09; 'thats': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'suggest': 0.14; 'unwise': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'do.': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'help.': 0.21; 'seems': 0.21; 'appears': 0.22; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**1': 0.23; '2.x': 0.24; 'unicode': 0.24; 'server.': 0.24; "haven't": 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'switch': 0.26; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'along': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; '3.x': 0.31; 'stuff': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'third': 0.33; 'advice': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; '2.6': 0.36; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'changing': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'problems': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'moving': 0.39; 'changed': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'identify': 0.61; 'areas': 0.61; 'took': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'taking': 0.65; 'articles': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'dont': 0.67; 'mar': 0.68; 'study': 0.69; 'informed': 0.78; 'break.': 0.84; 'joel': 0.91; 'watched': 0.91; 'lot,': 0.93; 'luck': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BEJBeLgvR9YS2qKdNDBF1sQEHNMieXk6Lkugpql3Oc8=; b=sWIemVi9VeOoxw8yhpC/VHpYffqO7NsSF1zNzZEYRXxWkTS2a62D5hswNz2z/Yhum6 /8uRlG3yrq8pwpvkKWTtns5lyqGe2xqESmGkuS5Z4q3I7i+G7cW7geBhqkWoavdDGe6h IGeF42hDoIBUhS4AP0hsELI1WyYAdZVrFQu3auBSUMEhzNgLHZt6lTh8+D0duI0/HgDe zX3JsEW635w7Ghzf1ydig/jq24gFF2KRVPJ9mcBOg4nzAPMXCtqHP3n0QjmbTKHpYgjm TKxo4wnCHVdiSxk5Wy1VuU49OMs5oKIHknwmUiO6TCxbawOwnFKjQpCt+3SfbHrWDN23 s0gg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.180.195 with SMTP id dq3mr16001032vdc.9.1364498676166; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:24:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <96fcb30a-9857-4016-ae6e-7b07eab2d03a@googlegroups.com> <1f7b3a17-8f90-48c8-889c-d60da47a2f47@googlegroups.com> <8dc29dce-d3e6-46f4-9614-942778236bb9@googlegroups.com> <688cf423-c0c3-4b4f-805f-ae10b1346101@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:24:35 -0400 Subject: Re: No errors displayed but i blank scren nstead. From: Joel Goldstick To: =?UTF-8?B?zp3Or866zr/PgiDOk866z4EzM866?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51969f3e3b96904d9011a04 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:24:27 +0100 Cc: "python-list@python.org" , comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 81 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1364556268 news.xs4all.nl 6955 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45627 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:42237 --bcaec51969f3e3b96904d9011a04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:05 PM, =CE=9D=CE=AF=CE=BA=CE=BF=CF=82 =CE=93=CE= =BA=CF=8133=CE=BA wrote: > Well i dont like people taking to me this way espceially when iam tryign = 2 > days for something and thats changing from 2.6 =3D> 3.2.3 > > I follow advice as long as i can understand whats being said to me. > > So if someone wants to help by asking me to try things please do. > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > I think you took an unwise approach to switch from 2.6 to 3.2.3 on a live server. I haven't tried 3.x yet, but I have seen lots of articles and videos about what is involved in moving that way. The unicode stuff seems to be a big change. Another issue is whether third party modules that work for 2.x are available for 3.x. Following along with your questions it appears you just changed interpreters and then watched things break. I suggest that you go back to study what is different about 3.x from 2.x. When you have a good understanding of that, go through your 2.x code and identify all of the areas that seem likely not to work. Then write some small test programs in 3.x to see if you can make the various functions work. You will learn a lot, and when you have problems you will be able to come back here and ask more informed questions, and likely will get more willing help. good luck --=20 Joel Goldstick http://joelgoldstick.com --bcaec51969f3e3b96904d9011a04 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:05 PM, =CE=9D=CE=AF=CE=BA=CE=BF=CF=82 =CE= =93=CE=BA=CF=8133=CE=BA <nikos.gr33k@gmail.com> wrote:
Well i dont like people taking to me this wa= y espceially when iam tryign 2 days for something and thats changing from 2= .6 =3D> 3.2.3

I follow advice as long as i can understand whats being said to me.

So if someone wants to help by asking me to try things please do.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

I think you took an unwise approach t= o switch from 2.6 to 3.2.3 on a live server.=C2=A0 I haven't tried 3.x = yet, but I have seen lots of articles and videos about what is involved in = moving that way.=C2=A0 The unicode stuff seems to be a big change.=C2=A0 An= other issue is whether third party modules that work for 2.x are available = for 3.x.=C2=A0 Following along with your questions it appears you just chan= ged interpreters and then watched things break.=C2=A0 I suggest that you go= back to study what is different about 3.x from 2.x.=C2=A0 When you have a = good understanding of that, go through your 2.x code and identify all of th= e areas that seem likely not to work.=C2=A0 Then write some small test prog= rams in 3.x to see if you can make the various functions work.=C2=A0 You wi= ll learn a lot, and when you have problems you will be able to come back he= re and ask more informed questions, and likely will get more willing help.<= br>
good luck



--
--bcaec51969f3e3b96904d9011a04--