Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:using': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'subject:Anyone': 0.07; 'supported.': 0.07; 'ugly': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; '__future__': 0.09; 'library': 0.13; 'users,': 0.13; 'heavily': 0.15; '"from': 0.16; '2.6,': 0.16; '3.2,': 0.16; 'centos': 0.16; 'highlighting': 0.16; 'lurking': 0.16; 'subject:still': 0.16; 'to:addr:pearwood.info': 0.16; 'to:addr:steve+comp.lang.python': 0.16; "to:name:steven d'aprano": 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'dec': 0.22; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; '2.5,': 0.23; 'received:192.168.1.100': 0.23; 'received:209.85.213.46': 0.23; 'received:mail- yw0-f46.google.com': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i'm": 0.26; 'import': 0.27; 'fix': 0.27; 'all,': 0.28; 'integration': 0.28; 'depends': 0.28; 'developers.': 0.29; 'expressions': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'conditional': 0.30; 'fun.': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'wondering': 0.32; "isn't": 0.33; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.33; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; '2.4': 0.34; 'project': 0.35; 'uses': 0.36; 'hat': 0.37; 'like,': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'another': 0.37; 'could': 0.37; 'using': 0.38; 'authors': 0.38; 'steven': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'getting': 0.38; "i'd": 0.39; 'everyone': 0.39; "it's": 0.40; 'received:209': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'packages': 0.40; '2011': 0.61; 'matter': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'production': 0.71; 'customers': 0.71; 'commercial': 0.73; 'bigger,': 0.84; 'ships': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5wj1uR7waiWhOSzjLVWfhSGW6+hm6QzWFD13nRM69L4=; b=vgEtwlMvd/p5hQVt3e9SX0JbpbTpKIWLq4c2jJbuyu5Fa04U8I9+dmT6xMqoTbBLVa ekA4polNW2WIA+7jdkAYrZ8/TuglqN19ASvTqhHUCQdyFNACetwRVRlnTRVE3cXieJC3 1k0Tg6it0obq31gIFtK/dkyY09To0jRWWvaIo= Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:04:13 -0200 From: "George R. C. Silva" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven D'Aprano Subject: Re: Anyone still using Python 2.5? References: <4ef1b9fa$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: <4ef1b9fa$0$29973$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1324472668 news.xs4all.nl 6984 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38825 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:17658 Em quarta-feira, 21 de dezembro de 2011 08:50:34, Steven D'Aprano escreveu: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:15:46 +0000, Chris Withers wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays? >> >> Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is >> everyone on 2.6+ nowadays? > > Centos and Red Hat production systems still use Python 2.4, so yes, > absolutely, 2.5 and 2.4 still need to be supported. > > Not necessarily by package authors though -- that's a matter for them to > decide. I'm presently writing a small library which will support 2.4 > through 3.2, which isn't as hard as it sounds like, but still isn't > exactly fun. If the project were much bigger, I'd drop support for 2.4 > and only support 2.5. At least then I could use conditional expressions > and __future__ imports. > > >> I'm finally getting some continuous integration set up for my packages >> and it's highlighting some 2.5 compatibility issues. I'm wondering >> whether to fix those (lots of ugly "from __future__ import >> with_statement" everywhere) or just to drop Python 2.5 support. >> >> What do people feel? > > It really depends on *your* users, not arbitrary developers. How many of > your users are using 2.5? > > > There are still people on 2.5. ESRIs customers (www.esri.com) that rely heavily on Python 2.5, because it ships with a popular ArcGIS release (9.31). The new ArcGIS release uses 2.6, but I can see 9.31 lurking around for another year, at least. Cheers.