Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.048 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:134': 0.05; 'granted,': 0.07; 'python': 0.11; '16:03': 0.16; 'ignoring': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'developers': 0.25; 'required.': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'not.': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'too': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'support,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'first': 0.61; 'kind': 0.63; 'choices.': 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqgEAAzkUVWGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABchEGDHslaCgKCBgEBAQEBAYUsAQEDASNVBgsLGgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUTBgICiCAItRiPM4RJAQEIAiCBIYoYhQwWglKBRQEEnTiHTo8cI4IJHIFUbQGCRQEBAQ Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:34:07 +0200 From: Antoon Pardon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: anomaly References: <554F9525.5040101@digipen.edu> <5550815E.5080600@rece.vub.ac.be> <87fv73iavz.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87617zi53k.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> In-Reply-To: <87617zi53k.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1431430455 news.xs4all.nl 2844 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48123 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:90442 Op 11-05-15 om 16:03 schreef Marko Rauhamaa: > Antoon Pardon : > >> The point is that all too often someone wants to defend a specific >> choice the developers have made and cites some general rule or >> principle in support, ignoring the fact that python breaks that >> rule/principle in other area's. > Granted, but you have set the trap for them by demanding a justification > when no justification was required. Every language has their cute > idiosyncrasies and arbitrary design choices. I did not. My first reaction was after someone made this kind of defence. -- Antoon Pardon