Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post2.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: UNSURE 0.231 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.58; '*S*': 0.04; 'subject:module': 0.04; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'stringent': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'fri,': 0.28; '24,': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'technical': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'there': 0.34; 'quite': 0.34; 'requirements': 0.35; 'be,': 0.35; "isn't": 0.35; 'but': 0.37; 'hello,': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'hope': 0.60; 'your': 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'cameron': 0.67; 'jun': 0.67; 'news': 0.74; 'licensing': 0.84; 'received:46': 0.84; 'subject:PDF': 0.84; 'received:hu': 0.91 X-Spam-Score: -0.856 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.856 tagged_above=-20 required=4 tests=[AWL=-0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:40:16 +0200 From: Ervin =?utf-8?Q?Heged=C3=BCs?= To: Cameron Laird Subject: Re: Looking PDF module References: <2366cd3c-1cd4-420e-98cb-5a7b39d7fe8b@c20g2000vbv.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 23:19:40 +0200 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1308950381 news.xs4all.nl 512 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:36477 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8411 hello, On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:59:17AM -0700, Cameron Laird wrote: > Hegedüs Ervin, it's quite likely that ReportLab will be a good > technical fit > for you. it's a good news :) > Are you in a position to pay licensing fees for advanced > features? no :( > Do you have any requirements to *merge* PDF instances? may be, hope I don't, but currently I don't know, > How stringent > are your > performance requirements? there isn't stringent... thanks: a.