Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Mark Lawrence Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: [beginner] What's wrong? Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 02:04:05 +0100 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <99234e90-fcd4-4a05-b97f-b47228dde20c@googlegroups.com> <1459571270.714249.566352882.6ADCD0CC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87bn5sqcac.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <56ffedf1$0$1611$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87h9fkq7tl.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <877fgfrefw.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <57006856$0$1614$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de WwsxFdFJwnrLEOiwKd3YpQw1LYv1sGfu/sXNYv7ONIPw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.006 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; '0.1': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; "they've": 0.09; '0.3': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'agree.': 0.16; 'hurts': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'silly': 0.16; 'subject:beginner': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'all,': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'referring': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'gaming': 0.29; 'quantities': 0.29; 'normally': 0.30; 'language.': 0.32; 'run': 0.33; 'michael': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'question,': 0.35; 'unknown': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.37; 'busy': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'takes': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'entire': 0.61; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'course': 0.62; 'day.': 0.63; 'times': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; "they're": 0.66; 'spend': 0.67; 'reply': 0.68; 'sport': 0.72; 'away,': 0.84; 'gamers.': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'stone': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.234.189.93 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 In-Reply-To: <57006856$0$1614$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:106336 On 03/04/2016 01:48, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 07:42 am, Michael Selik wrote: > >> Gaming also helps your reaction time. Normally 0.3 ms, but 0.1 ms for top >> gamers. And fighter pilots. > > Does gaming help reaction time, or do only people with fast reaction times > become top gamers? > > Personally, in my experience gaming hurts reaction time. I ask people a > question, and they don't reply for a week or at all, because they're too > busy playing games all day. > I must agree. When you're trying to get the ball away, and 23 stone of bone and muscle smashes into you, that slows your reaction time. I am of course referring to the sport of rugby, not that silly "World Series", which takes part in only one country, where for some reason unknown to me they wear huge quantities of armour and need oxygen masks after they've run a few yards. What would happen to the poor little darlings if they had to spend the entire match on the pitch? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence