Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.027 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'alias': 0.07; 'badly': 0.07; 'width': 0.07; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'aug': 0.13; 'int32': 0.16; 'subject:unicode': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'documented': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; '(which': 0.26; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'notes': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'stores': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'subject:, ': 0.61; 'subject:...': 0.63; '26,': 0.65; 'subject:, ...': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=qoxGa2zoyPR3qDjb1NHH/D+GDtzXw2fCt3kP/TCJrjY=; b=VoOZWh11efn5LU2KFy3FlChzm+OhZ12jrUYiSnkmIzhhHb1aefsRBSpi0TVcNsllnV rZ+a1meUcGOMf3joCricoXVtWgC2OLkpFymzSqGev9eeJJuDnbAEpyeL1viw01G516Xj W1IaKEvcR0mBmxXxYuR13x+k8FA4qWcFUy33k9k5Si/vKf/fGnx659YpkpVMRqx/mKgf QwfZ6EfOt0deVEatgoaulfYo3LAdxWMrUYQz8Ui8DGpDcl8DgKgefHgGCbTBhL4ytdq9 bC+3A16rSxcI1xcECrasI9biMF9y4nn8w78vxfEK9lGaHwDLbhCxWPxf9rvdXw7W7EME tVwg== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <503a8361$0$6574$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <1874857c-68ef-4c1b-b15a-46ef47df9445@googlegroups.com> <1cb3f062-eb45-4b0c-977b-76afb099923c@googlegroups.com> <503a0d51$0$6574$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <503a8361$0$6574$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> From: Ian Kelly Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:42:00 -0600 Subject: Re: Flexible string representation, unicode, typography, ... To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1346017353 news.xs4all.nl 6924 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43281 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:27949 On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:40:13 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > >> I think the documentation for those functions is simply badly worded. >> The "width in bytes" it returns is not the width of the rune (which as >> jmf notes is simply an alias for int32 that stores a single code point). > > Is this documented somewhere? http://golang.org/ref/spec#Numeric_types