Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.057 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.89; '*S*': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; 'imply': 0.07; 'subject:based': 0.07; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:syntax': 0.16; 'thunderbird': 0.16; 'syntax': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'received:209.85.213.46': 0.23; 'received:mail- yw0-f46.google.com': 0.23; 'referring': 0.23; 'windows': 0.26; 'expect': 0.26; "wasn't": 0.28; 'sorry,': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'comment': 0.32; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.33; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'subject:/': 0.35; 'received:192': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'your': 0.61; 'kind': 0.61; 'customer': 0.65; 'attitude': 0.67; 'business.': 0.80; 'directed': 0.82; 'show.': 0.84; 'worthy': 0.84; 'proposal.': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0swGEWsOLLcH0iPUFFFowV+hVTg3pXeG7vBh30aHIx0=; b=ZF614y7Y5wplZmsHOdfPewG+MlfjThJSeksz4RJAAfpAkZrKWh37BuIunbB5citbXh APpxQi+MEfPAKnCiMGaKBE4ruoIuva9OY9sZNNWZ0P+7KrakV2Qm5NH9JQTifj5f8N6s RpJVicT/ObnqJPpBAXW7En3VuQ1wxZ6mAEem4= Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:41:42 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "comp.lang.python" Subject: Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax References: <841f4d29-f50b-4b0b-912b-b497fb6e60ec@t16g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <15424060.724.1324183952802.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prix23> <4eeda5fc$0$29979$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4eee92aa$0$11091$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <67794961-950a-4689-a7b1-de18eca946e6@p16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 9 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1324345310 news.xs4all.nl 6857 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53941 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:17535 On 12/19/2011 7:18 PM, Roy Smith wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't meaning to imply support for the syntax proposal. Just > reacting to the (seemingly unrelated) comment that a customer with > foolish access policies would not be worthy of your business. It was directed at Rick, and by "your", I was referring to him specifically, as that is the kind of attitude I might expect him to show. -- CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640 | Thunderbird 7.0