Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'fixes': 0.07; 'responding': 0.07; 'counting': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'mentorship': 0.09; 'perks': 0.09; 'subject:skip:a 10': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'missed': 0.12; 'suggest': 0.14; '2.7': 0.14; '3.3,': 0.16; 'for,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'happily': 0.16; 'https': 0.16; 'occurs.': 0.16; 'sadly': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:Problem': 0.16; 'subject:https': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'who?': 0.16; 'worst': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'fixed.': 0.24; 'issue,': 0.24; 'versions': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'tracker': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; '2009.': 0.30; 'dec': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'went': 0.31; 'towards': 0.31; 'changed.': 0.31; 'minor': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'open': 0.33; 'says': 0.33; 'bugs': 0.33; 'development.': 0.33; 'proceed': 0.33; 'core': 0.34; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'version': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; '2.6': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'issue': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'aspects': 0.39; 'supporting': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'read': 0.60; 'slowly': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'further': 0.61; 'worth': 0.66; 'request.': 0.70; 'subject:get': 0.81; 'subject:over': 0.84; 'sitting': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=A1ICT6+RTSPH6iRRs/j6LfQjfIwbbGFDg3Y/3TAHE9M=; b=bw1+5z37E9D14EkFBxhPEpQhjqy4iWQQCWt1WI9VJM+lMXUMqOoBfRdf0iTj3+91Rt Ru5ZWC5IqtnYq1QgbdaHl0EfS8Cy5DmgesJ11mtEgBmntLE/3xjaNs5FQcdd9OWtm24w w3RcqdznTOiXA1/0hJGny/yyYKEy0UUckzYL8mlx5XJpLGI+/yGgLF6AFMhJyqtCabBG CRcpRfQ0FTxy+1cu5Gfc5Qi5E6N6KhleZdYVG2XRq8PArc9l0p/DjK/VJmg7cWx1YwTB sLwSWMWXMJexpbfhxYfeXNoNRlHlCuI46s4nruy9qehfbujDAZtN4XZFn3GnKXeccxLe B/Lw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.236.133 with SMTP id uu5mr3142486pbc.153.1386684855203; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 06:14:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8fe2ad78-0bd4-40d8-909c-1d2784441e3c@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com> <58f2558c-33fe-4ee0-9a0a-2563374be47c@x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <446a3c42-6d86-4003-85be-3e5d8a23b268@c14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 01:14:15 +1100 Subject: Re: Problem when applying Patch from issue1424152 to get https over authenticating proxies working with urllib2 in Python 2.5 From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 30 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1386684865 news.xs4all.nl 2958 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33935 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:61470 On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 10/12/2013 13:47, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:35 AM, wrote: >>> >>> Is this issue fixed. I am also facing the same issue of tunneling in >>> https request. Please suggest how to proceed further >> >> >> You're responding to something from 2009. It's highly likely things >> have changed. >> > > Says who? Sadly IMHO this has been one of the worst aspects of Python > development. I've seen 10 year old bugs happily sitting on the bug tracker. > Thankfully that is slowly changing. The core mentorship program is helping, > plus the gradual reduction in the number of versions that need supporting as > 2.6 is now out of support and we move towards 3.4. However there are still > 4275 open issues on the bug tracker. Anyone up to help out, the pay and > perks are really good? :) There've been two minor versions since the version cited in the post (2.5), not counting Python 3 at all. It's definitely worth rechecking on 2.7 or 3.3, to see if the same still occurs. (Or, of course, to read the tracker issue, which in this case was known and needn't be searched for, a fact that I missed noticing when I went reading.) Yes, four years' worth of bug fixes does make it at least somewhat likely that something's changed. ChrisA