Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.011 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:based': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'content-type:multipart/signed': 0.09; 'filename:fname piece:signature': 0.09; 'typing': 0.15; 'content- type:application/pgp-signature': 0.16; 'driscoll': 0.16; 'filename:fname piece:asc': 0.16; 'filename:fname:signature.asc': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:syntax': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'of.': 0.18; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'definition': 0.30; 'allowed,': 0.30; 'argue': 0.30; 'pretty': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'things': 0.34; 'subject:/': 0.35; 'apply': 0.35; 'but': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.37; 'think': 0.37; 'received:128': 0.37; 'received:192.168.0': 0.38; 'put': 0.38; "i'd": 0.39; 'being': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'types': 0.61; 'account': 0.66; 'subject:\t': 0.93 Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:08:04 -0600 From: Evan Driscoll User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Pythonification of the asterisk-based collection packing/unpacking syntax References: <841f4d29-f50b-4b0b-912b-b497fb6e60ec@t16g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <4eed3b00$0$29979$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4EED57E5.2020900@wisc.edu> In-Reply-To: <4EED57E5.2020900@wisc.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE6DECB745C68A5BC3CE1384D" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 37 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1324177735 news.xs4all.nl 6913 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38367 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:17427 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE6DECB745C68A5BC3CE1384D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/17/2011 21:03, Evan Driscoll wrote: > Personally I'd put Python even weaker on account of things such as > '[1,2]*2' and '1 < True' being allowed, but on the other hand it > doesn't allow "1"+1. Not to mention duck typing, which under my definition I'd argue is pretty much the weakest of typing that you can apply to structure-like types which I can think of. Evan --------------enigE6DECB745C68A5BC3CE1384D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO7VkVAAoJEAOzoR8eZTzgrUcIAIjTXy65MCWOK18WvmSOa9xE uTXK1LnR3A0rgCKR1tORZanDIAqdvl4hXUhJ0xV5gQa2guOs74QFHMY5vsAbbww8 sHqygFrX61n1FfGJEsReoKyGa9ZzIYwD8PiPH+y+SurpAU84nZLzQv0fZ9HOKHNw teZs+S+gFFGfZIhbwSkHGtw9kv+7CYzsFca0RVgTtNUWt/gPrG/V0fbNPNWGlpKL jfZr0zd1xHgzSNXSKCjO6KPtTMdCvWe4rkI7UnY8dq6+QujUj8tsRIH2smeaZtTE 3qhQNqYhGz9MuerqOJYzxh0JodEYKaMvqT4FjbgwpDkE6N2FV0R+2GoS3tEmaUE= =7pbQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE6DECB745C68A5BC3CE1384D--