Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8ed4b168-7a45-4476-9078-080c43f4c1f1@googlegroups.com>
References: <264c1144-5d04-4ad0-aa32-f4e6770d210c@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3733.1386527267.18130.python-list@python.org> <2243d31b-f2cb-484a-b6a3-f9f265aa8fd6@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3737.1386529135.18130.python-list@python.org> <78e2bedb-edcb-47ab-a89d-b62d60611481@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3739.1386530226.18130.python-list@python.org> <95f70ade-57a5-4537-85ba-1b612812212f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3749.1386548889.18130.python-list@python.org> <8ed4b168-7a45-4476-9078-080c43f4c1f1@googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:57:37 +1100
Subject: Re: python programming help
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3762.1386575861.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 30
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:61367

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:07 PM,  <rurpy@yahoo.com> wrote:
> However it does not change the fact that people here have responded
> in rather extreme way to GG posts including calling GG users "twits"
> and claiming GG posts damage their eyesight, as well as repeatedly
> denying the obvious fact that GG is much easier to use for many than
> to subscribe to a usenet provider or to a mailing list.  One frequently
> sees words like "crap", "slimy", "rubbish" etc to describe GG posts
> which is pretty intimating to people who just want some help with a
> python question using a tool they already know how to use and have
> had no complaints about in other places.

Please note though that there is a difference between describing the
users as twits and describing the posts as slimy. Suppose you write a
letter (the sort that goes on a slab of dead tree) and, instead of
placing it in an envelope and putting a stamp on it, you hand it to
the Arac News Insertion Device[1] to do the enveloping for you. He
does a reasonable job of it, but he uses cobwebs instead of paper for
the envelope. Sure, it's still readable... but your readers now have
to rub off a whole lot of cobwebs before they can read what you said.
That makes your post distasteful, without it being at all your fault -
other than choosing to use Arac's service. That's how I see Google
Groups posts. Someone's gone looking for help about Python and has
found that. It's not their fault that they don't know about
alternatives; so I point out the alternatives.

ChrisA

[1] http://math.boisestate.edu/gas/princess_ida/webop/pi_04.html
On the whole we are
Not intelligent...