Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.048 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'figuring': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.13; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.13; 'subject:skip:t 10': 0.15; 'eckhardt': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'seconds,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'seconds': 0.21; 'dec': 0.22; "doesn't": 0.22; 'asked': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'obviously': 0.25; 'sat,': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'idea': 0.32; 'rather': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'right,': 0.34; 'things': 0.34; '17,': 0.34; 'duplicate': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'not,': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; "i'd": 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'difference': 0.40; '2011': 0.61; 'types': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; '12:32': 0.84; '62,': 0.84; 'ranges': 0.91; 'year"': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xrSL0ZG2UFrMFW4hS5u4XyzFHyxfacbGdJkZ54bxz84=; b=kCRJz91I7i66JncEEEWKQk6izgOthiNp4knGkbJdFbFDHej8nmA1SLcyhZaVn7GSc7 pEHeOiN+SnjPemrrRl8SNppSybEzKPsO2JCJs/044c0TWv5oA31o640UgYjuIbExFARu t42tzX7YII9V9PvGRIQ5lcIFGhPPBVpyBzp2w= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:24:53 +1100 Subject: Re: modifying a time.struct_time From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1324045497 news.xs4all.nl 6846 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35960 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:17356 On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > Concerning the idea to use seconds, I'd rather not, because already the > number of seconds per minute ranges from 60 to 62, and it doesn't get better > with things like months (28...31 days), years (365...366 days) and all other > types built upon them. Right, which is why I asked how important the difference between "365 days" and "1 year" is. Obviously if your goal is one entire calendar year, then you don't want to duplicate the work of figuring out how many seconds that is. ChrisA