Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:two': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'check.': 0.09; 'dns,': 0.09; 'oh,': 0.09; 'percentage': 0.09; 'ping': 0.09; 'recommends': 0.09; 'wraps': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'server,': 0.15; 'slightly': 0.15; 'enough.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'literal,': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject:questions': 0.16; 'tcp': 0.16; 'tcp,': 0.16; 'time.time()': 0.16; 'string': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.17; "shouldn't": 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'solution.': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'bit': 0.21; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.21; '(b)': 0.22; 'assumes': 0.22; 'option.': 0.22; 'simpler': 0.22; '15,': 0.23; 'somebody': 0.23; 'tried': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'looks': 0.26; 'supported': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'actual': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'once,': 0.29; 'surprised': 0.29; 'case,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'connection': 0.30; 'minimal': 0.30; 'query': 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; '(a)': 0.33; 'docs': 0.33; 'true.': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'that,': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'done': 0.34; 'server': 0.35; 'needed': 0.35; 'fail': 0.35; 'nov': 0.35; 'remote': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'apple': 0.36; 'too': 0.36; 'supporting': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'supports': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'save': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'solve': 0.62; 'ever': 0.63; 'times': 0.63; 'response.': 0.67; 'smith': 0.71; 'sounds': 0.71; 'article': 0.78; 'comparable': 0.84; 'flip': 0.84; 'hardly': 0.84; 'outgoing': 0.91; 'eliminates': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gxfPhQCY7PzjN2M3hbWWCoYmdH0Gp1q5jXwwuYPldJg=; b=UoUudO7KmPlipMcJR5YkLx2rwacV+Q5YZdj6UpCZyNIpqR7SPqORC50hwxqaTwmV/w NuJ5uhHziE2LsZEFKHdOfpXpMQVT98ega+eU3Gkns+IV/pO/BdEq79W9Lx+Vck6fXz2C 61+duODC9vnrZ/DPVc+sRXhGCWg+gkjoxY5E/5+SQnTWmKk3DMHhfczjFAUGDZ+DA64P yBXn1LgTATArT9b9gEtfKG2nSKHiE3LRCBoyMThzeYircOejITIXx9JcSGo2CGjFqRs0 h1q7otp+3F3tMDnjsMoCK2G4wxxtQMtUkU8iD93QLE8aK57aEdIyTEvyREMeHIoQ2q6W qOQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:54:29 +1100 Subject: Re: Subprocess puzzle and two questions From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1352930072 news.xs4all.nl 6846 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47669 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33356 On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > I wrote: >>> Oh, my. You're using DNS as a replacement for ping? Fair enough. In >>> that case, all you really care about is that you can connect to port 53 >>> on the server... >>> >>> s = socket.socket() >>> s.connect(('8.8.8.8', 53)) > > In article , > Chris Angelico wrote: >>That assumes that (a) the remote server supports TCP for DNS > > This is true. I honestly don't know what percentage of DNS servers > out there only support UDP. The two I tried (Google's 8.8.8.8, and my > Apple TimeCapsule) both supported TCP, but that's hardly a > representitive sample. I don't know either, all I know is that DNSReport recommends supporting TCP, and none of my DNS servers ever fail that check. >> and (b) that connection time for TCP is comparable to >> ping or an actual DNS lookup. > > My first thought to solve both of these is that it shouldn't be too > hard to hand-craft a minimal DNS query and send it over UDP. Then, I > hunted around a bit and found that somebody had already done that, in > spades. Take a look at http://www.dnspython.org; it might be exactly > what's needed here. Yeah, that sounds like a good option. I'm slightly surprised that there's no way with the Python stdlib to point a DNS query at a specific server, but dnspython might be the solution. On the flip side, dnspython is dauntingly large; it looks like a full implementation of DNS, but I don't see a simple entrypoint that wraps it all up into a simple function that can be bracketed with time.time() calls (granted, I only skimmed the docs VERY quickly). So it may be simpler to hand-craft an outgoing UDP packet once, save it as a string literal, send that, and just wait for any response. That eliminates all DNS protocolling and just times the round trip. ChrisA