Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.006 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '\xe2\x80\x94': 0.09; '*you*': 0.16; 'finney': 0.16; 'gandhi': 0.16; 'happy.': 0.16; 'possible?': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:GUI': 0.16; 'not,': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'apparently': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'everyone': 0.33; 'possible.': 0.35; 'tool': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'fun,': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'ben': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'no.': 0.61; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'respect': 0.70 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Ben Finney Subject: Re: Python GUI? Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:23:03 +1000 References: <1a8b14b3-85f3-4515-ba43-9b40e1a89f1d@googlegroups.com> <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784f11@googlegroups.com> <5233ac22$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <13ae937d-65ad-4cf7-9f20-58c10ef96b78@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: rasputin.madmonks.org X-Public-Key-ID: 0xBD41714B X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 9CFE 12B0 791A 4267 887F 520C B7AC 2E51 BD41 714B X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-gpg.asc X-Post-From: Ben Finney User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pL9CrdhgfC4W0k4VVf+gf1z4C84= X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1379121799 news.xs4all.nl 15881 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44163 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:54150 eamonnrea@gmail.com writes: > But is it efficient to use an axe? Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or efficiency? > Is it sensible to use an axe when there is a chainsaw? No. Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or sensibility? > Eventually, everyone will be using chainsaws, and no one will be using > axes. Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or popularity? > This is my point: to have fun and be productive, but apparently it's > not possible. Who has said that's not possible? If you find using a tool to be both fun and productive, use it and be happy. If not, use something else. -- \ “They can not take away our self respect if we do not give it | `\ to them.” —Mohandas Gandhi | _o__) | Ben Finney