Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=uU6Fzu1+7/Ifuj1Ua1Gu1gjaq7FxV6UbMZjJJJIyCTGjLgTOXd04NlMyMKDXpTvEGp 89NFwWEnCUa2y+3nZ0k+IdnDEjwPDRU3tnQfUc2WNfv93d5d0eZI3xDaL8NOLVYKYHbC 8Pova8UsnW3XvuxzUOaKwpCFZ6ZowUwh91i98=
Subject: Re: [OT] Free software versus software idea patents
From: Westley =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDnez?= <anikom15@gmail.com>
To: python-list@python.org
In-Reply-To: <4da6fe5e$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References: <mailman.65.1302065189.9059.python-list@python.org> <t7Vmp.7632$zn.3197@newsfe19.iad> <mailman.72.1302078388.9059.python-list@python.org> <4d9c5ca5$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87tyebf3r3.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au> <4d9d6a4a$0$29992$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <6Nknp.10080$lx3.7480@newsfe02.iad> <BANLkTi=-9_F7ZQ8S23WCxGSWP-5mSt-LMw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.118.1302200288.9059.python-list@python.org> <Ynonp.2277$YL5.1440@newsfe05.iad> <4d9e6551$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <Z2ynp.10498$0s5.3031@newsfe17.iad> <4da0f1e1$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <cArop.17646$sS4.7406@newsfe11.iad> <mailman.219.1302542844.9059.python-list@python.org> <sRUop.2627$7N3.197@newsfe10.iad> <mailman.279.1302637061.9059.python-list@python.org> <D7wpp.14226$sy5.2295@newsfe22.iad> <mailman.353.1302772509.9059.python-list@python.org> <4da6fe5e$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:46:46 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.368.1302814014.9059.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3213

On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 14:02 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:15:05 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> 
> > 4) Assumes people aren't deliberately fiddling the figures. Yeah, that
> > would be correct. We're in the realm of conspiracy theories here... does
> > anyone seriously think that browser stats are THAT important that they'd
> > go to multiple web servers with deceitful hits? 
> 
> Back in the day, not that many years ago, when it looked like Internet 
> Explorer would never dip below 90% market share and web developers coded 
> for IE quirks instead of standards as a matter of course, I used to 
> fantasize of writing a Windows virus that (apart from propagating) did 
> nothing but change the user-agent string on IE. It would have been 
> awesome to witness the consternation among web developers.
> 
> But thanks to the EU doing what the US DOJ refused to do, and the grass-
> roots popularity of Firefox (plus a fewer well-known even if not often 
> used browsers like Safari and Opera), and then Google's scarily efficient 
> way they can capture hearts and minds on the Internet, IE's market share 
> has been whittled away to the point that there are places in the world 
> where IE is a minority browser. A large minority, it is true, but still a 
> minority.
> 
> Now, if only we could convince web users that having your browser execute 
> untrusted code downloaded from the Internet is not such a good idea, 
> supposed sandbox or not. What the world needs is a virus that silently 
> removes Javascript and Flash from browsers...
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steven

Web developers will always use the tool they find to be the most
reliable, efficient, and useful, as will consumers.