Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'programmer': 0.03; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'syntax': 0.04; 'argument': 0.05; 'attribute': 0.07; 'wednesday,': 0.07; 'attributes': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'unified': 0.09; 'identifiers': 0.16; 'piotr': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:accessing': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'do.': 0.18; 'later': 0.20; 'proposed': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'removed.': 0.24; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'compared': 0.30; 'problem': 0.35; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'december': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'next': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'new': 0.61; 'day.': 0.63; 'taking': 0.65; 'account': 0.65; 'between': 0.67; 'invalid': 0.68; 'subject:there': 0.68; 'subject:being': 0.84; '2013': 0.98
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: python-list@python.org
From: Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu>
Subject: Re: Why is there no natural syntax for accessing attributes with names not being valid identifiers?
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:07:51 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Norwich University
References: <15912943-29a1-4365-b027-7bb8cec447f8@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3527.1386093834.18130.python-list@python.org> <eb15e1a8-49b1-4d55-a864-141efc65394e@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3543.1386119133.18130.python-list@python.org> <d13e811f-f496-418a-b737-f4fbf1286cc5@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3588.1386193334.18130.python-list@python.org> <e106efd6-a604-4ccc-b225-a9a566d43a26@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: jackman.norwich.edu
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1/mm/ao (Win32)
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3650.1386338903.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1386338903 news.xs4all.nl 2834 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41858
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:61150

On 2013-12-04, Piotr Dobrogost
<p@google-groups-2013.dobrogost.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:41:49 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti
> wrote:
>> not something to do commonly. Your proposed syntax leaves the
>> distinction between valid and invalid identifiers a problem
>> the programmer has to deal with. It doesn't unify access to
>> attributes the way the getattr and setattr do.
>
> Taking into account that obj.'x' would be equivalent to obj.x
> any attribute can be accessed with the new syntax. I don't see
> how this is not unified access compared to using getattr
> instead dot...

I thought of that argument later the next day. Your proposal does
unify access if the old obj.x syntax is removed.

-- 
Neil Cerutti