Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.05; 'say,': 0.05; '(python': 0.07; "'a'": 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'question.': 0.14; 'windows': 0.15; 'behave': 0.16; 'from:addr:pitrou.net': 0.16; 'from:addr:solipsis': 0.16; 'from:name:antoine pitrou': 0.16; 'interpreter,': 0.16; 'message-id:@post.gmane.org': 0.16; 'nick': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'stdout': 0.16; '>>>': 0.22; 'input': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'handling': 0.26; 'holds': 0.26; 'code:': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'code': 0.31; '(my': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'linux': 0.33; 'running': 0.33; 'case,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'hat': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'previous': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'embedded': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'different': 0.65; 'prompt': 0.68; 'press': 0.70; 'behavior': 0.77; '3.3.1': 0.84; 'antoine.': 0.84; '2013,': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Antoine Pitrou Subject: Re: standalone vs embedded interpreter Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:13:15 +0000 (UTC) References: <516434C9.6020705@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 88.163.232.20 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 32 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1365524014 news.xs4all.nl 2621 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46183 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:43192 Nick Gnedin gmail.com> writes: > I expect it to behave the same way as if I was running it as a > standalone program. On Windows this is indeed the case, but on my Linux > box (Python 3.3.1 (default, Apr 8 2013, 22:33:31) [GCC 4.1.2 20080704 > (Red Hat 4.1.2-51)]) I get a different behavior in handling console > input. A standalone interpreter cycles though the input history when I > use up and down arrows - say, I type this code: > > >>> 1 > 1 > >>> a=4 > >>> a > 4 > > If I now press an key in a standalone interpreter, I get 'a' placed > at the prompt (my previous command). However, in an embedded code I get > > >>> ^[[A > > put at the prompt - does anyone know what I am doing wrong? Are stdin and stdout both interactive? That is, are isatty(fileno(stdin)) and isatty(fileno(stdout)) both true? If you want to debug, take a look at PyOS_Readline() in Parser/myreadline.c. It probably holds the answer to your question. Regards Antoine.