Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'ignored': 0.05; 'needed,': 0.05; '21,': 0.07; 'bits': 0.07; 'problem:': 0.07; 'responding': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'thread': 0.11; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'aug': 0.13; 'did,': 0.16; 'jerry': 0.16; 'log.': 0.16; 'modules,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'pieces': 0.17; 'pointed': 0.17; 'libraries': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'installed': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'script': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'question': 0.27; '2.6': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'rest': 0.28; 'optional': 0.29; 'received:209.85.160.46': 0.32; "aren't": 0.33; 'version': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'wrong': 0.34; 'clear': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'operating': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'system.': 0.39; 'build': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'john': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'response.': 0.67; 'topic,': 0.78; 'clueless': 0.91; 'commenting': 0.91; 'reply,': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=K2zmKxjlHoB6D6utLFM1DGKzVApm3IQrhjwXxQjcTTo=; b=p7j0v/0Gh7KyqcMaEfnDvekJY27ce/L4PqQtm1KK19PkAHaQEY6X7Rx8khuFZntzex DBfmLMdNLXEtcbmhLrINp4+d7spkA/tLigRDg7nQsDfxP12XVj96kWCGdQNOcs+c9iAY ZHRaR7DFpvtDhEn9BT0kK5BEzsWhCuccfaNU9/pVo4JXskDSIlbKqBweHNpbO8k4ZA4Z hBc1j8SxKPk5ZJkiHFz8VbKwAekiBALmDCQKW7bSEwMJIM8cQKae77vwJcLslBBKnRlT RP9z7U8DSmRNY3PApDnsdmC073HojdsQRFuxWSiF2y3w1pP5mrtPvFspAttTQSBjoWvK 1I4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:06:43 -0400 Subject: Re: python 6 compilation failure on RHEL From: Jerry Hill To: John Nagle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1345550807 news.xs4all.nl 6935 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59424 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:27566 On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:34 AM, John Nagle wrote: > After a thread of clueless replies, it's clear that nobody > responding actually read the build log. Here's the problem: The very first reply, Emile's, pointed out that these were optional modules, and that python did, in fact build successfully. > Failed to find the necessary bits to build these modules: > bsddb185 > dl > imageop > sunaudiodev > > What's wrong is that the Python 2.6 build script is looking for > some antiquated packages that aren't in a current RHEL. Those > need to be turned off. They don't need to be turned off. They can either be ignored (because they aren't needed, and did not cause the build to fail), or the development libraries for those pieces can be installed and python recompiled. The rest of the thread has been commenting on the OP's choice of python version and operating system. That's not exactly on topic, but the original question was answered in the very first response. -- Jerry