Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'preferably': 0.05; 'attributes': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'notation.': 0.16; 'ought': 0.16; 'piotr': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:accessing': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'our': 0.64; 'subject:there': 0.68; 'obvious': 0.74; '"one': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'subject:being': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: python-list@python.org
From: Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Why is there no natural syntax for accessing attributes with names not being valid identifiers?
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 20:55:35 +0000
References: <15912943-29a1-4365-b027-7bb8cec447f8@googlegroups.com> <mailman.3527.1386093834.18130.python-list@python.org> <eb15e1a8-49b1-4d55-a864-141efc65394e@googlegroups.com> <17gt99hg615jfm7bdid26185884d2pfdkf@4ax.com> <5eb566a0-3911-48fa-ba83-a863da66a55d@googlegroups.com> <529F8F23.20006@stoneleaf.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-179-74.as13285.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
In-Reply-To: <529F8F23.20006@stoneleaf.us>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3585.1386190551.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1386190551 news.xs4all.nl 2907 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48363
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:61048

On 04/12/2013 20:22, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 12:07 PM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
>>
>> If there ought to be only one way to access attributes then it should
>>  be dot notation.
>
> Not "only one way", it's "one obvious way".
>
> --
> ~Ethan~

Not "one obvious way" it's "There should be one-- and preferably only 
one --obvious way to do it.".  Get it right lad :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence