Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'skip:/ 10': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'pressing': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'aug': 0.13; '2.7.3?': 0.16; 'binaries': 0.16; 'install.': 0.16; 'reason.': 0.16; 'received:173.11': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'still,': 0.16; 'later': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'version.': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'stick': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'first,': 0.27; 'question': 0.27; '2.6': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; '(unless': 0.29; '-0700,': 0.29; 'second,': 0.29; 'van': 0.29; 'source': 0.29; 'install': 0.29; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'version': 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'red': 0.60; 'forced': 0.84; 'omission': 0.84; 'fyi': 0.91; 'intends': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Emile van Sebille Subject: Re: python 6 compilation failure on RHEL Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:19:23 -0700 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 173-11-108-137-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 30 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1345490260 news.xs4all.nl 6866 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50272 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:27526 On 8/20/2012 11:37 AM Walter Hurry said... > On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:02:25 -0700, Emile van Sebille wrote: > >> On 8/20/2012 10:20 AM Walter Hurry said... >>> I concur, but FYI the version of Python with RHEL5 is 2.4. Still, OP >>> should stick with that unless there is a pressing reason. >> >> Hence, the 2.6 install. > > First, sorry for my omission to trim. > > Second, the reason for recommending that OP stick to the Red Hat provided > version (unless there is a pressing reason) is the question of the > already-paid-for Red Hat support. Generally, when you compile from source the binaries will install to /usr/local/bin and not be in conflict with RH's install version. > And for that matter, if OP is forced to a later Python 2 version than > 2.4, why not 2.7.3? Package dependencies. If the OP intends to install a package that doesn't support other than 2.6, you install 2.6. Emile