Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'empty,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'subject:python': 0.11; 'steve': 0.13; 'apis.': 0.16; 'cleaner': 0.16; 'from:addr:behnel.de': 0.16; 'from:addr:stefan_ml': 0.16; 'from:name:stefan behnel': 0.16; 'inaccessible': 0.16; 'readable': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'skip:i 40': 0.17; 'stefan': 0.17; 'trying': 0.21; "i'd": 0.22; "i've": 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'this?': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'asking': 0.32; 'received:84': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'list': 0.35; 'nov': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'data': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'page': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'times': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'smith': 0.71; 'received:arcor-ip.net': 0.84; 'received:pools.arcor-ip.net': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Stefan Behnel Subject: Re: A gnarly little python loop Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:56:10 +0100 References: <5a260a79-818d-47a8-9404-37b014587730@px4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-084-056-004-120.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: <5a260a79-818d-47a8-9404-37b014587730@px4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 39 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1352620798 news.xs4all.nl 6917 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41349 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33121 Steve Howell, 11.11.2012 04:03: > On Nov 10, 2:58 pm, Roy Smith wrote: >> I'm trying to pull down tweets with one of the many twitter APIs. The >> particular one I'm using (python-twitter), has a call: >> >> data = api.GetSearch(term="foo", page=page) >> >> The way it works, you start with page=1. It returns a list of tweets. >> If the list is empty, there are no more tweets. If the list is not >> empty, you can try to get more tweets by asking for page=2, page=3, etc. >> I've got: >> >> page = 1 >> while 1: >> r = api.GetSearch(term="foo", page=page) >> if not r: >> break >> for tweet in r: >> process(tweet) >> page += 1 >> >> It works, but it seems excessively fidgety. Is there some cleaner way >> to refactor this? > > I think your code is perfectly readable and clean, but you can flatten > it like so: > > def get_tweets(term, get_page): > page_nums = itertools.count(1) > pages = itertools.imap(api.getSearch, page_nums) > valid_pages = itertools.takewhile(bool, pages) > tweets = itertools.chain.from_iterable(valid_pages) > return tweets I'd prefer the original code ten times over this inaccessible beast. Stefan