Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <roy@panix.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'slow.': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'suggestions:': 0.09; 'to:addr:pobox.com': 0.09; 'to:addr:skip': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'assume': 0.14; '(use': 0.16; 'received:166.84': 0.16; 'received:166.84.1': 0.16; 'received:166.84.1.89': 0.16; 'received:mailbackend.panix.com': 0.16; 'received:panix.com': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'subject:slow': 0.16; 'tempted': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'received:166': 0.19; 'split': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'creating': 0.23; '2.x': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; '---': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'matching': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; '(which': 0.31; 'open': 0.33; 'beginning': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'received:66': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; "didn't": 0.36; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'easily': 0.37; 'performance': 0.37; 'pm,': 0.38; 'that,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'making': 0.63; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.63; 'smith': 0.68; 'obvious': 0.74; 'yourself': 0.78; 'difference.': 0.84; 'email addr:panix.com': 0.84; '2013,': 0.91
Subject: Re: Why is regex so slow?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Roy Smith <roy@panix.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANc-5UyouN5EQw_GDecaAR+inyAB26g=e2pZ=zBuspXdmxJh+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:08:52 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <kpq2r9$gg6$1@panix2.panix.com> <CANc-5UyouN5EQw_GDecaAR+inyAB26g=e2pZ=zBuspXdmxJh+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3544.1371575342.3114.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 30
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1371575342 news.xs4all.nl 15889 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60585
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:48644


On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:01 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote:

>> I don't understand why the first way is so much slower.
>=20
> I have no obvious answers, but a couple suggestions:
>=20
> 1. Can you anchor the pattern at the beginning of the line?  (use
> match() instead of search())

That's one of the things we tried.  Didn't make any difference.

> 2. Does it get faster it you eliminate the "(.*)" part of the pattern?

Just tried that, it also didn't make any difference.

> It seems that if you find a line matching the first part of the
> pattern, you could just as easily split the line yourself instead of
> creating a group.


At this point, I'm not so much interested in making this faster as =
understanding why it's so slow.  I'm tempted to open this up as a =
performance bug against the regex module (which I assume will be =
rejected, at least for the 2.x series).

---
Roy Smith
roy@panix.com