Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.035 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'subject:module': 0.09; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'subject:library': 0.16; ':-)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'meant': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'question': 0.24; 'right.': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'michael': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'guess': 0.33; 'next': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'explain': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; "you're": 0.61; '"can': 0.84; 'rusi': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:08:36 -0600 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Python module vs library References: <03ee1902-ac8a-4d1f-9f2b-8e796fcccfe8@googlegroups.com> <4963dfe6-4fa1-444e-b703-5d6e05a942f7@ul7g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <4963dfe6-4fa1-444e-b703-5d6e05a942f7@ul7g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1365520122 news.xs4all.nl 2564 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60935 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:43182 On 04/09/2013 08:29 AM, rusi wrote: > I guess Michael meant "...module or package." > Else the next question is going to be "Can you explain recursion in > python?" :-) You're right. On both counts. :)