Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'example:': 0.03; 'arguments': 0.07; 'plenty': 0.07; 'other,': 0.09; 'subject:using': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'sat,': 0.15; 'contrived': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'headers,': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'whatever,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'headers': 0.17; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.21; 'body,': 0.22; 'header': 0.24; 'paul': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'handling': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'chris': 0.28; 'represent': 0.28; 'dictionary': 0.29; 'writes:': 0.29; 'subject:all': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'keyword': 0.30; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'nov': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'modules': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'to,': 0.65; 'subject:there': 0.65; 'subject:before': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6NBKHLtU4M6O/q+XojtuSMf8ckbqAHegmSnDq7e1a3Q=; b=oN8rEcwUBRF2pob1/M9nlDJFNyik3d2hV6wl+ue1hJ0rJ+S1UV/MAZas54mRK/T+zz 5Xet7H+bzNPa7qcMekNvTDXByE7fjWt5FgWvQhqOwrvyJJPT+XFqeAFa23HGedVQI7qI Op+JpD+iJJ/sYh5i3+RQ+PXvKhO6I1NIge1u19Qh8t3YCuiwuv4PGMeQo5SsSbQzeb4x h6fgM0d8T0nxgqPwW+71Y1e7oA0muMtRvkBNthsKlLoVZmmhMqiVejJKZyuFqu+6YDiO 5ePBBYyrrsxdcRWvHAVAJVf5Gpr/TpTekHJ5pjRT3L/in/FLzwGfZayHx93m1AtRB/Tl jKqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7x390iw19i.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> References: <18134e77-9b02-4aec-afb0-794ed900d194@googlegroups.com> <7xlieadv9o.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <7x390iw19i.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:19:11 +1100 Subject: Re: Is there a simpler way to modify all arguments in a function before using the arguments? From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1352539154 news.xs4all.nl 6904 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60013 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33082 On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: > Chris Angelico writes: >> Contrived example: >> def send_email(from, to, subj, body, whatever, other, headers, you, like): > > That should be a dictionary with the header names as indexes. In fact > there are already some email handling modules in the stdlib that > represent headers that way. That's also plausible, but keyword arguments do make sense. And this was a top-of-the-head contrived example; I'm sure there are plenty of good use-cases. ChrisA