Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Terry Reedy Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Fast pythonic way to process a huge integer list Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 22:10:13 -0500 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <7e2b93e4-c224-40c4-8e88-7dcc847edab1@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de ZqTfMTIa+1TjyXPtm1BrhArNu+95FBhmIrMEoae7Bfpg== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; '128': 0.09; 'chunks': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:process': 0.09; 'jan': 0.11; 'integers.': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'tried': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'subject:list': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'list': 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'received:71': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'really': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'detail': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.62; '9:36': 0.84; 'subject:Fast': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-185-227-36.phlapa.fios.verizon.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 In-Reply-To: <7e2b93e4-c224-40c4-8e88-7dcc847edab1@googlegroups.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:101316 On 1/6/2016 9:36 PM, high5storage@gmail.com wrote: > > I have a list of 163.840 integers. What is a fast & pythonic way to process this list in 1,280 chunks of 128 integers? What have you tried that did not work? This is really pretty simple, but the detail depend on the meaning of 'process a chunk'. -- Terry Jan Reedy