Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'subject:error': 0.09; 'talks': 0.10; 'am,': 0.12; ':o)': 0.16; 'unpacking': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'that?': 0.18; 'otherwise.': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'received:au': 0.36; 'thread': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'subject:day': 0.68; 'exposed.': 0.84; 'dark': 0.91; 'received:110': 0.95 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Lie Ryan Subject: Re: Misleading error message of the day Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:46:15 +1100 References: <27000242.1109.1323358430515.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqny18> <4EE114E2.6070200@sequans.com> <4EE11A69.9060207@stoneleaf.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 110-175-240-90.static.tpgi.com.au User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <4EE11A69.9060207@stoneleaf.us> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1323395189 news.xs4all.nl 6972 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54941 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16888 On 12/09/2011 07:13 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote: >> You have to opportunity to not use unpacking anymore :o) There is a >> recent thread were the dark side of unpacking was exposed. Unpacking >> is a cool feautre for very small applications but should be avoided >> whenever possible otherwise. > > Which thread was that? perhaps the one that talks about `a, a.foo = 1, 2` blowing up?