Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <554F9525.5040101@digipen.edu>
References: <CAMjeLr--RfnfgWc1hdOcHiEBpq3QwC7SZk-m14wM65JtpbgMLQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.318.1431276220.12865.python-list@python.org> <c681b3ce-2727-4aa9-ad8a-369c662395a3@googlegroups.com> <554F9525.5040101@digipen.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 14:12:44 -0500
Subject: Re: anomaly
From: boB Stepp <robertvstepp@gmail.com>
To: python-list@python.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.345.1431329316.12865.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 52
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:90355

I am in process learning Python and normally hang out on the Tutor
list, but monitor this one hoping to learn what I can. This thread is
of interest to me from the standpoint of trying to understand the
Python way of doing things.

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> wrote:
> On 05/10/2015 09:48 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 10:14:36 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here's something that might be wrong in Python (tried on v2.7):
>>>>
>>>>>>> class int(str): pass
>>>
>>> This defines a new class named "int" that is a subclass of str. It has
>>> no relation to the builtin class int.
>>>
>>>>>>> int(3)
>>>>
>>>> '3'
>>>
>>> This creates an instance of the above "int" class, which is basically
>>> equivalent to calling "str(3)".
>>>
>>> Were you expecting a different result?
>>
>> In C (family) languages int is a keyword
>>  From that pov this is completely bizarre
>
>
> Not really.  Expecting Python to act like C family languages *is* bizarre.

I have to admit being surprised by this, too. I am just now studying
on how to write my own classes in Python, and have come to realize
that doing this is *possible*, but the *surprise* to me is why the
language design allowed this to actually be done.

> Common Python thought::  "We're all adults here."    If you want to override
> a builtin within your own namespace, who are we to stop you?

I'm surprised that this thought has not been added to the "Zen Of
Python", as I see it as more and more recurrent as I continue my
studies. What I would like to comprehend is what is the essential
mindset of Python? That is, what do I need to understand, so that I am
no longer likely to be surprised by discovering new possibilities in
Python such as what the current thread is discussing?


-- 
boB