Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'bits': 0.07; 'subject:adding': 0.07; 'unexpected': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'subclasses': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'def': 0.13; 'algorithm': 0.13; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.13; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.13; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'subject:set': 0.16; 'type:': 0.16; 'unhashable': 0.16; 'this:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; '3.2': 0.18; '(most': 0.21; 'dec': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'changed': 0.23; 'ones.': 0.23; 'traceback': 0.24; '(in': 0.26; '(this': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'fine.': 0.29; 'idle': 0.29; 'class': 0.29; 'fewer': 0.30; 'hash': 0.30; 'typeerror:': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'value.': 0.32; 'comment': 0.32; "can't": 0.32; 'fri,': 0.34; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.34; 'last):': 0.34; 'however,': 0.36; 'file': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'skip:_ 10': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'according': 0.61; '2011': 0.61; 'easily.': 0.67; 'saw': 0.67; '__eq__(self,': 0.84; 'interesting,': 0.84; 'other):': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'x):': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rI/tO0WbYJgTe557asX8nCOgvSpeIhe+9WtyGYui1bE=; b=cXjapPT/3d0z97tQ2AA9cTTBMcYUQuWrdDfuaP2EQAIy/qT6YYZk/Q2NTFqNtj9OSL guWIFesLjauI6U7X33IwpowIO3OYW4JAVkn5P8D36efwzbd0hU0zMLeDo0zLwTyrgnRd 2K6jdoGj7k/sG79nMZYqaYc9byoUjDRnCKWgY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4EE0E72E.2040104@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 04:37:18 +1100 Subject: Re: adding elements to set From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 31 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1323365841 news.xs4all.nl 6938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52624 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16854 On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: > The only thing that has changed (in 2.7) is the algorithm to calculate the > hash value. The bits are rotated to turn the four least significant bits > into the most signicant ones. According to a comment in Objects/objects.c > the change leads to fewer hash collisions. Interesting, but what I saw was this: >>> class C(object): def __init__(self, x): self.x = x def __eq__(self, other): return self.x == other.x >>> s=set() >>> c1=C(1) >>> s.add(c1) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in s.add(c1) TypeError: unhashable type: 'C' (This is in IDLE from Python 3.2 on Windows.) However, s.add(object()) works fine. So subclasses don't get that. Odd. Makes sense though - you can't get this unexpected behaviour as easily. ChrisA