Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news-transit.tcx.org.uk!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.015 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'am,': 0.12; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.13; 'received:mail-iy0-f174.google.com': 0.13; '3.3.': 0.16; "function's": 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.16': 0.16; 'thunderbird': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'pep': 0.23; 'somehow': 0.23; 'windows': 0.26; 'do.': 0.28; 'planned': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'actual': 0.32; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'rather': 0.33; 'instead': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'see,': 0.34; 'but': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'seeing': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'piece': 0.66; 'subject:!!!': 0.76; '10:38': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q2N1iuQy6sHXI/IV7foahE+XrZWl/SQsYCUOHF9GKe0=; b=mtXRMCws1af33sY+Zb+kTXW0IKAPXpDEXHLo3a2aNBe1KmbSWuwJlKzXSRzHQzIgP+ zMQPoJXK4/Jb6Xayu+6ml+xY79dVfCxIDWNtKyot0RfcMeLeyWEzzCk1OkjreVr1+URi g0F2Qe/NVMHnXAndyQXmOhlxdqEx0IRb72aXE= Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:54:54 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "comp.lang.python" Subject: Re: I love the decorator in Python!!! References: <29996186.628.1323328726122.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfb7> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 8 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1323363307 news.xs4all.nl 6920 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34624 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:16851 On 12/8/2011 10:38 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > One piece of sophistication that I would rather like to see, but don't > know how to do. Instead of *args,**kwargs, is it possible to somehow > copy in the function's actual signature? I remember seeing this in a PEP that is planned to be implemented in 3.3. -- CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640 | Thunderbird 7.0