Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'odd': 0.07; 'python3': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:method': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'subject:make': 0.16; 'subject:possible': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'tests': 0.22; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'fixing': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'subject:" ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'name': 0.63; 'otten': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Is it possible to make a unittest decorator to rename a method from "x" to "testx?" Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:50:47 +0200 Organization: None References: <215331fa-379f-4251-b722-44555349fbb5@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p50848d18.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.7.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1375951856 news.xs4all.nl 15981 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55152 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:52178 Peter Otten wrote: > $ python3 mytestcase_demo.py -v > test_one (__main__.test_two) ... ok > test_two (__main__.test_two) ... ok > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 2 tests in 0.000s Oops, that's an odd class name. Fixing the name clash in Types.__new__() is left as an exercise...