Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'subject:two': 0.07; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:2.7.3': 0.16; 'subject:between': 0.16; 'subject:these': 0.16; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'posting': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37 X-Received: by 10.49.84.35 with SMTP id v3mr539838qey.16.1363572889442; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:14:49 -0700 (PDT) Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:14:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.188.179.16; posting-account=AvekzAoAAABj-TclKcOWQmXwA49MFPGX References: <485a3093-8c07-4d1a-b49e-af32f84f8198@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 70.188.179.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Python 2.7.3] What's the difference between these two uses of "for"? From: "Yves S. Garret" To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 1 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1363573404 news.xs4all.nl 6957 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50549 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:41385 I don't get why it's posting what I said twice...