Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.029 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; '3.3,': 0.16; 'buggy': 0.16; 'complaining': 0.16; 'demonstrable': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'not,': 0.20; 'code,': 0.22; 'memory': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; '15,': 0.26; 'handling': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'compared': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; '3.2': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'leads': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.38; 'most': 0.60; 'due': 0.66; 'benefit': 0.68; 'real- world': 0.68; '2015': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=X+xOZY0TChVy2BNNe5nbNfKtmuv75i4Y21HDjy5IZcM=; b=YnVhc54uLOCq5RScDzVgDz7BEkw8X9mxKpyvtuyYWxkZSRB4u59tRMhdAs0qAjxVop yGE8mDEE/cLMap4294x4HVzqvulVbD4E9ik9eKyQRPoDojAKM/1PoOgIrnRyM/KbxOzE Rl49YxW90oBIsileAMGp68iACEut1WZJZ7JHwBf8oCztUrFa0SYk2FBFyvdW1JIOa4yc mUknx0pjTUSrgaH8Q8GO1yep6xyeUiOozfAnt2z8tYaRMSuY1ge3z9FajuPI93fZ2ZRi w990vshD5is9OEaKGsyJSfeHHb2ykRkOSxnuihhevrLfD26RBPqQG2t2RJMEGbDQY3cd at2Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.146 with SMTP id f18mr18627316igt.14.1431693276332; Fri, 15 May 2015 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5555e228$0$13002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <7JN4x.37133$Q41.15375@fx25.am4> <6w35x.645690$I97.19867@fx31.am4> <874mnfunpn.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87bnhmgqrx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <877fsagptd.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <5f588ae2-4f89-477a-a9ad-ac7913cf7459@googlegroups.com> <87y4kqf6z8.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <5555e228$0$13002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 22:34:36 +1000 Subject: Re: Building CPython From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 14 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1431693285 news.xs4all.nl 2957 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47783 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:90671 On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > The benefit of this is that most strings will use 1/2 or 1/4 of the memory > that they otherwise would need, which gives an impressive memory saving. > That leads to demonstrable speed-ups in real-world code, however it is > possible to find artificial benchmarks that experience a slowdown compared > to Python 3.2. It's also possible to find a number of situations in which a narrow build of 3.2 was faster than 3.3, due to the buggy handling of surrogates. I've no idea whether jmf is still complaining against that basis or not, as I don't see his posts. ChrisA