Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.009 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'source.': 0.05; 'none)': 0.07; 'ast': 0.09; 'typed': 0.09; 'def': 0.13; 'interpreter': 0.15; 'arg):': 0.16; 'fits': 0.16; 'thought.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'work,': 0.21; 'code.': 0.23; 'thus': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'right.': 0.27; 'see,': 0.27; "skip:' 10": 0.28; 'initial': 0.28; 'code': 0.30; 'guess': 0.31; 'source': 0.33; 'definition': 0.34; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'so,': 0.35; 'best,': 0.35; 'could': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'missing': 0.37; 'turned': 0.38; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'ha,': 0.84 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:56:08 +0200 From: "Sven R. Kunze" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Context-aware return References: <55f1c3c6$0$1659$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <55F1C5D6.7020202@mail.de> <85r3m66t0m.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <55F1CD23.5060009@mail.de> <55F1CFC0.6070505@mail.de> In-Reply-To: <55F1CFC0.6070505@mail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 1162 X-purgate-ID: 154282::1441911380-00000883-834E4EBB/0/0 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 39 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1441911387 news.xs4all.nl 23837 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35575 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:96288 Oops, missing print: On 10.09.2015 20:45, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > On 10.09.2015 20:34, Sven R. Kunze wrote: >> You are right. I turned out to me harder that I first thought. >> >> My initial guess was like: use AST. But now I see, it would be hard >> to get the source code. >> >> So, what actually could work, would be faking the interactive >> interpreter wrapping it up and thus have control over the source code >> typed in. > > Ha, got it: sys.settrace > > >>> def traceit(frame, event, arg): ... print(frame, event, arg) > ... return traceit > > >>> sys.settrace(traceit) > > >>> a=1 > (, 'call', None) > (, 'line', None) > (, 'return', (u'a=1\n', 4)) > (, 'call', None) > (, 'line', None) > (, 'return', None) > > > There you got the source. The use an AST to find out whether the line > fits your definition of 'interactive'. > > That should only be necessary when the top frame is interactive. > > > Best, > Sven