Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreted': 0.07; 'nested': 0.07; 'objects,': 0.07; 'mutable': 0.09; 'rows': 0.09; 'tuple': 0.09; '10x10': 0.16; '[[]]': 0.16; 'distinct': 0.16; 'identities.': 0.16; 'innermost': 0.16; 'shallow': 0.16; 'uncommon': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'copied': 0.17; 'element': 0.17; 'meant': 0.21; 'latter': 0.22; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; 'work,': 0.22; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'andrew': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'subject:list': 0.28; 'objects': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'received:209.85.215.46': 0.30; 'writes': 0.30; 'expect': 0.31; 'lists': 0.31; 'not.': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'themselves': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.35; 'lists.': 0.35; 'nov': 0.35; 'especially': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'except': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'level': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'containing': 0.61; 'different': 0.63; 'dict,': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=BHEDeFytyxod8m6JeYZFXmtmKaboFQ4kiZs1Y4zdzj0=; b=UQUsjwXeSJiUyOYtalr/eeg5G2mw1iPnuzkJa9/wO7k2zrjdCHNlaub4Blzjb1auVL mtfXwR+z4mhIhJGEeWZI86SptkR+ZGLc0X2WHOQ/Tbg128K520O85npwh3QYQEyzG9Bk PjR3VGVJ1dmTVDbH7TVGreGUagTzNT18V++oCkV12b/5RWsA7AB7oQxiTP20zRueGbui 8AF4umjVQRMi3KTMYIPA9KBV99eIrbiICsmqL7lcJVKFvSrViP1GJTdqWf00fLvgweV0 RLCDuJTvaalYcd3HKXM7ikHKY7Mz8k5sG1UH4ImYOHFH6A9MFOW/01cYQ/5aHRc/A6xc rJNw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <509982CA.7050701@r3dsolutions.com>
References: <mailman.3267.1352096879.27098.python-list@python.org> <50978323$0$6908$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <CAHVvXxQR2J2tyFcQZd7bNYTAeetwM+LfoV4UcYrkRfeNVOj+pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmqzQi2TEjme_we-KfmG7vxOfRWoKG=zL=SGHYGqiFf9_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHVvXxQNCxpACM=tkKir0f3iVqui4oVGnyS-GywO+dtGacKAdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5098A55C.3090201@r3dsolutions.com> <CAPTjJmpjwNtn-Dj2vyP2CPt+BZUzBgCkCvG=3J=x5=2ftmV04A@mail.gmail.com> <5098C873.2000200@r3dsolutions.com> <CALwzidmx0HxJ9-2GkzPWMV5VCKc+ypOp8D2qSxw-MfmyS9No1Q@mail.gmail.com> <509982CA.7050701@r3dsolutions.com>
From: Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:46:52 -0700
Subject: Re: Multi-dimensional list initialization
To: Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3342.1352242045.27098.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 20
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1352242045 news.xs4all.nl 6877 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45768
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:32844

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Andrew Robinson
<andrew3@r3dsolutions.com> wrote:
> I meant all lists are shallow copied from the innermost level out.
> Equivalently, it's a deep copy of list objects -- but a shallow copy of any list contents except other lists.

Why only list objects, though?  When a user writes [[]] * 10, they
probably want a list containing ten distinct nested lists.  Likewise,
when a user writes [{}] * 10, they probably want a list containing ten
distinct dicts, which is not at all an uncommon thing to want.  It
seems very inconsistent that the former should work while the latter
should not.  This is especially true when you start mixing the two
paradigms; the user might expect [[{}] * 10] * 10 to create a a 10x10
matrix where each element is a distinct dict, but this still would not
work, even though the nested lists would all have different
identities.

What about ([],) * 10?  This is perhaps best interpreted as a request
to create a matrix of ten rows where the rows themselves are mutable
but the collection of rows is not.  If list multiplication were to
copy nested lists, then should tuple multiplication do the same?