Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.022 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:question': 0.08; 'indexes': 0.09; 'subject:()': 0.09; 'aug': 0.13; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'subject:API': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'exists': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'matching': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; '-0700,': 0.29; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'received:192.168.1.3': 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'received:84': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'method': 0.36; 'one,': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'skip:" 10': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'skip:n 10': 0.63; 'records.': 0.65; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'furman': 0.84; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.91 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=IekFqBWa c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=DKcI9XZsuF4A:10 a=xb2YPhB8IJoA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=sUy49W4grkkA:10 a=jNF6-ERqhd6HGZH07UIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 X-AUTH: mrabarnett:2500 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:21:18 +0100 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: dbf.py API question concerning Index.index_search() References: <502c4439$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <502C4B3A.6000603@stoneleaf.us> In-Reply-To: <502C4B3A.6000603@stoneleaf.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1345083673 news.xs4all.nl 6912 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39939 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:27136 On 16/08/2012 02:22, Ethan Furman wrote: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:26:09 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote: >> >>> Indexes have a new method (rebirth of an old one, really): >>> >>> .index_search( >>> match, >>> start=None, >>> stop=None, >>> nearest=False, >>> partial=False ) >> [...] >> >> Why "index_search" rather than just "search"? > > Because "search" already exists and returns a dbf.List of all matching > records. > Perhaps that should've been called "find_all"!