Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.033 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'interfaces': 0.04; 'guido': 0.05; 'that?': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'oh,': 0.09; 'path)': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'gui': 0.12; 'mostly': 0.14; 'elephant': 0.16; 'fine).': 0.16; 'merely': 0.16; 'simple.': 0.16; 'subject:son': 0.16; 'exception': 0.16; 'thursday,': 0.16; 'ignore': 0.16; 'so.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'normally': 0.19; 'slightly': 0.19; 'programming': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'creating': 0.23; 'instance,': 0.24; 'lets': 0.24; 'test.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'equivalent': 0.26; 'train': 0.26; 'second': 0.26; 'skip:" 20': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'correct': 0.29; 'received:209.85.217': 0.29; 'needed.': 0.30; 'statement': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'along': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; '(although': 0.31; '13,': 0.31; 'really,': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'there.': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'stuff': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'open': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'done.': 0.35; 'johnson': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'complete.': 0.36; 'consistent': 0.36; 'interaction': 0.36; 'interface,': 0.36; 'whilst': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'manager': 0.38; 'generic': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'realize': 0.39; 'use.': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'games,': 0.60; 'is.': 0.60; 'full': 0.61; 'browser': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'address': 0.63; 'term': 0.63; 'telling': 0.64; 'become': 0.64; 'provide': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'talking': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'of:': 0.68; 'tasks.': 0.68; 'default': 0.69; 'lol.': 0.74; 'subject:wants': 0.74; 'day': 0.76; 'click': 0.77; 'skip:$ 10': 0.81; 'quicker': 0.84; 'room.': 0.84; 'seriously,': 0.84; 'graphical': 0.91; 'navigate': 0.91; 'rick': 0.93; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M92QfqzR+OQ1TXsxssl3No+1veMF4iWyN2wX4HkgEPQ=; b=imDjPjCwKyWpPwXv9QyFGVZ3npfSc6vH3lcai/YUHPgiH/5CjkY9zKqka4Ls8qI42b ygO0JQtGJsdGVP2Kijpj+CLdC6RqtLEY6nn6DLliH2IC5+8rxlKTjRvzxcIoXCdVmrnN lH8Bb2+79PhIdGpeRnN/gXW3GWRxeMO399SRcU2y3hysP6qhRL7dupZnsp834pd+yPXm 7+b40AQPUsLqzWnrLktedUVc5bOJF5jeqibjQhAEsddMhUbu6+lF6yZM6KFoWShe/O5o LDkXJMlgucEbVayR11r8vqcvbJO1acOVEu2jo+rWuPnhTUqs3HJTc0TdFhItWiwyjVhI 8W/g== X-Received: by 10.152.20.40 with SMTP id k8mr322487lae.25.1371186758907; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 22:12:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <637daa98-9a0e-46ab-bb9a-f5638b7c0038@googlegroups.com> References: <637daa98-9a0e-46ab-bb9a-f5638b7c0038@googlegroups.com> From: Joshua Landau Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:11:58 +0100 Subject: Re: My son wants me to teach him Python To: Rick Johnson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 70 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1371186766 news.xs4all.nl 15946 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49453 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:48061 I don't normally respond to trolls, but I'll make an exception here. On 14 June 2013 04:33, Rick Johnson wrote: > On Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:18:57 PM UTC-5, Joshua Landau wrote: > >> [...] >> GUI is boring. I don't give a damn about that. If I had it >> my way, I'd never write any interfaces again (although >> designing them is fine). Console interaction is faster to >> do and it lets me do the stuff I *want* to do quicker. > > And are you willing to provide *proof* that the console is > faster? Or is this merely just your "opinion"? I would be > ready and willing to compete in a "Pepsi challenge" to > disprove your claim if needed. For instance, if i want to > open a text file on my machine, i merely navigate to the > file via my file browser interface, using clicks along the > way, and then the final double click will open the text file > using it's default program. Are you telling me you can type > the address faster (much less remember the full path) than i > can point and click? And if you think you're going to cheat > by creating an "environment variable", well i can still win > by doing the same thing with a "shortcut". 1) I said it's faster to implement, not faster to use. 2) Yes, I would win that test. Say I want to go to "Projects/Programming Tidbits/FeedLess", I'd write "j Fee". Done. I'm there. What was hard about that? 3) Gee, you think a graphical file manager is good? You should try Ranger. Seriously, it's way better. (Seriously) >> Also - Python is pretty much the only language that >> *isn't* overkill; once you take more than the first few >> steps a language that's *consistent* will help more with >> learning, a mon avis, than these "quicker" languages ever >> will. Python is consistent and simple. > > Your statement is an oft cited misconception of the Python > neophyte. I'm sorry to burst your bubble whilst also raining > on your parade, but Python is NOT consistent. And the more i > learn about Python the more i realize just how inconsistent > the language is. Guido has the correct "base idea", however > he allowed the evolution to become a train wreck. If you ignore stdlib, for a moment, lol. If you include stdlib you're just wrong, but not humorously so. >> [...] >> Basically, "kid" is a *very* generic term and there are >> people who like GUIs and there are people who like >> internals > > Your statement is true however it ignores the elephant in > the room. You can "prefer" console over GUI all day long but > that does not negate the fact that GUI's outperform the > console for many tasks. With the exception of text based > games, the console is as useful for game programming as a > cheese grater is for masturbation -- slightly amusing, but > mostly just painful! I'd like to see you write or do the equivalent of: when-changed $FILE.coffee "coffee -c $FILE.coffee; xclip -selection clipboard < $FILE.js; echo Update" in a GUI. Really, I would. Oh, and then make your result searchable with to all of your other little one-liners, in a process that takes =C2=BD a second to complete. Nevermind that I was talking about console programs being quicker to make this whole time, rather than quicker to use.