Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.006 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; '[],': 0.07; 'false,': 0.07; 'problem?': 0.07; 'happen.': 0.09; '{},': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message- id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'possible?': 0.16; 'reproduce': 0.16; 'subject:questions': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; "haven't": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'piece': 0.29; 'prints': 0.29; 'received:192.168.1.3': 0.29; 'skip:_ 10': 0.29; 'van': 0.29; 'maybe': 0.29; 'figure': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'problem.': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'anyone': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'code:': 0.33; 'hi,': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'shows': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'strange': 0.62; 'provide': 0.62; 'different': 0.63; 'results': 0.65; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.68; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'reply-to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'obvious,': 0.91 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=TdYURGsh c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=O2Kvzccb_dQA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=szZsM8mp6U8A:10 a=b4SmyxUErFPACx3GUhIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 X-AUTH: mrabarnett:2500 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 00:59:13 +0000 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: deepcopy questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1354064354 news.xs4all.nl 6960 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41851 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:33990 On 2012-11-27 23:59, lars van gemerden wrote: > Hi, > > I get a very strange result when using deepcopy. The following code: > > def __deepcopy__(self, memo): > independent = self.independent() > if independent is self: > out = type(self)() > out.__dict__ = copy.deepcopy(self.__dict__, memo) > print self.__dict__ > print out.__dict__ #strange result > return out > else: > return copy.deepcopy(independent, memo).find(self.id).take() > > prints different results for self.__dict__ and out.__dict__: > > {'_active_': False, 'init': {}, '_id_': 0, '_items_': [], '_name_': 'main'} > {'_active_': False, 'init': {}, '_id_': 0} > > Two items are missing in the copy. Maybe i am missing something obvious, but i cannot figure out how this could happen. > > Can anyone tell me how this is possible? > I haven't been able to reproduce the problem. Could you provide a self-contained and _runnable_ piece of code that shows the problem?