Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!uio.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'root': 0.05; 'element': 0.07; 'nested': 0.07; 'iterate': 0.09; 'parsing': 0.09; 'path)': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'stack.': 0.09; 'subject:fields': 0.09; 'subject:parsing': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; '"e"': 0.16; '[])': 0.16; 'from:addr:behnel.de': 0.16; 'from:addr:stefan_ml': 0.16; 'from:name:stefan behnel': 0.16; 'iterable,': 0.16; 'nesting': 0.16; 'node,': 0.16; 'node.': 0.16; 'nodes': 0.16; 'parent:': 0.16; 'pop()': 0.16; 'preserve': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'redundant.': 0.16; 'subject:XML': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'result.': 0.19; 'stefan': 0.19; 'examples': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; '>>>': 0.22; 'putting': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'parse': 0.24; 'tells': 0.24; 'fairly': 0.24; 'pass': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'skip:p 30': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'xml': 0.29; 'statement': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'reply.': 0.31; 'depth': 0.31; 'end,': 0.31; 'larry': 0.31; 'node': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'this.': 0.32; 'up.': 0.33; 'running': 0.33; 'beginning': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'subject:with': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'common': 0.35; 'done.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'i.e.': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'nov': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'remove': 0.60; 'skip:n 30': 0.60; 'then,': 0.60; 'reaching': 0.61; 'entire': 0.61; 'name:': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'times': 0.62; "you'll": 0.62; 'show': 0.63; 'name': 0.63; 'visit': 0.64; '26,': 0.68; 'received:87.139': 0.84; 'unclear': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Stefan Behnel Subject: Re: parsing nested unbounded XML fields with ElementTree Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:20:28 +0100 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p578baff2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 78 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1385472043 news.xs4all.nl 15957 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38722 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:60512 Larry Martell, 26.11.2013 13:23: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Larry.Martell...@gmail.com, 25.11.2013 23:22: >>> I have an XML file that has an element called "Node". These can be nested to any depth and the depth of the nesting is not known to me. I need to parse the file and preserve the nesting. For exmaple, if the XML file had: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> When I'm parsing Node "E" I need to know I'm in A/B/C/D/E. Problem is I don't know how deep this can be. This is the code I have so far: >>> >>> nodes = [] >>> >>> def parseChild(c): >>> if c.tag == 'Node': >>> if 'Name' in c.attrib: >>> nodes.append(c.attrib['Name']) >>> for c1 in c: >>> parseChild(c1) >>> else: >>> for node in nodes: >>> print node, >>> print c.tag >>> >>> for parent in tree.getiterator(): >>> for child in parent: >>> for x in child: >>> parseChild(x) >> >> This seems hugely redundant. tree.getiterator() already returns a recursive >> iterable, and then, for each nodes in your document, you are running >> recursively over its entire subtree. Meaning that you'll visit each node as >> many times as its depth in the tree. >> >> >>> My problem is that I don't know when I'm done with a node and I should >>> remove a level of nesting. I would think this is a fairly common >>> situation, but I could not find any examples of parsing a file like >>> this. Perhaps I'm going about it completely wrong. >> >> Your recursive traversal function tells you when you're done. If you drop >> the getiterator() bit, reaching the end of parseChild() means that you're >> done with the element and start backing up. So you can simply pass down a >> list of element names that you append() at the beginning of the function >> and pop() at the end, i.e. a stack. That list will then always give you the >> current path from the root node. > > Thanks for the reply. How can I remove getiterator()? Then I won't be > traversing the nodes of the tree. I can't iterate over tree. I am also > unclear on where to do the pop(). I tried putting it just after the > recursive call to parseChild() and I tried putting as the very last > statement in parseChild() - neither one gave the desired result. Can > you show me in code what you mean? untested: nodes = [] def process_subtree(c, path): name = c.get('Name') if c.tag == 'Node' else None if name: path.append(name) nodes.append('/'.join(path)) for c1 in c: process_subtree(c1, path) if name: path.pop() process_subtree(tree.getroot(), []) Stefan