Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Manolo =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mart=EDnez?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: You gotta love a 2-line python solution Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 17:32:46 +0200 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <20160502153246.GA16381@beagle.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de +0s734l617WTnBNz990SJQZH0qWHq7PdVK1weQrAOmUw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.024 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'resulting': 0.04; 'bug.': 0.07; 'simplified': 0.09; 'subject:python': 0.14; 'non-trivial': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'to:name:python-list@python.org': 0.20; 'code,': 0.23; 'code.': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'least': 0.27; 'guarantees': 0.29; 'larry': 0.29; 'reduced': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; 'non': 0.32; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'heard': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'ago.': 0.61; 'further': 0.62; 'therefore': 0.67; 'received:82.223': 0.84; 'reminds': 0.84 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20160502153246.GA16381@beagle.localdomain> X-Mailman-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:108017 On 05/02/16 at 11:24am, Larry Martell wrote: > That reminds me of something I heard many years ago. > > Every non-trivial program can be simplified by at least one line of code. > Every non trivial program has at least one bug. > > Therefore every non-trivial program can be reduced to one line of code > with a bug. Well, not really. Every non-trivial program can be reduced to one line of code, but then the resulting program is not non-trivial (as it cannot be further reduced), and therefore there are no guarantees that it will have a bug. M