Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.013 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'report.': 0.07; 'ping': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'arrays.': 0.16; 'feasible': 0.16; 'liu': 0.16; 'numpy': 0.16; 'out?': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'solver': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'memory': 0.17; 'language': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'bit': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.24; 'testing': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'error': 0.27; 'equivalent': 0.27; 'turns': 0.27; 'issues.': 0.29; 'creating': 0.30; 'error.': 0.31; 'option': 0.31; 'language.': 0.32; 'possibly': 0.32; 'problem': 0.33; 'doubt': 0.33; 'surely': 0.33; 'case,': 0.34; 'gives': 0.35; 'fail': 0.35; 'unknown': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'cases': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'several': 0.38; 'test': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'well.': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'studies': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'day.': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'hours': 0.65; 'due': 0.65; 'day,': 0.65; 'believe': 0.66; '26,': 0.72; 'increase': 0.73; 'forth': 0.79; 'received:89': 0.80; 'dramatically': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'url:scipy': 0.84; 'url:reference': 0.91; 'period.': 0.95 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: memory control in Python Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 19:21:04 +0100 References: <87io8hc8z3.fsf@handshake.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-89-240-170-87.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 48 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1439662878 news.xs4all.nl 2878 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50449 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:95396 On 15/08/2015 18:28, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 8/15/2015 3:21 AM, dieter wrote: >> Ping Liu writes: >>> ... >>> For small cases, Python works well. But if we consider longer time >>> period. >>> then it would fail due to the memory usage issues. We have tested >>> several >>> case studies to check the memory use for different time period, >>> including >>> 1) 2 hours in one day, 2) 24 hours in one day, 3) 20 days with 24 hours >>> each day, as well as 4) 30 days with 24 hours each day. The first 3 >>> cases >>> are feasible while the last case gives out the memory error. >>> >>> When we are testing the forth case, the memory error comes out while >>> creating the inequality constraints. The problem size is 1) Aeq: 12 * >>> 26, >>> Aineq: 30 * 26; 2) Aeq: 144*268, Aineq:316*268; 3) Aeq: 2880*5284, >>> Aineq: >>> 6244*5284; 4) Aeq: 4320 * 7924, Aineq is unknown due to the memory >>> error. >>> >>> The solver is CPLEX (academic). It turns out that the solver is taking a >>> lot of memory as you can see in the memory test report. for the first >>> three >>> cases, different memory usage is observed, and it grows up dramatically >>> with the increase of the time period. 1) solver memory usage: 25.6 >>> MB, 2) >>> 19.5 MB; 3) solver memory usage: 830.0742 MB. > > Make sure that the solver is using numpy arrays. > I doubt that as CPLEX was first released in 1988. A very quick bit of searching found this http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.optimize.linprog.html which I believe is the equivalent of the Aeq and Aineq mentioned above. Possibly a better option as must surely be using numpy, but as usual there's only one way to find out? :) -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence