X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 195.154.70.45 Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'base.': 0.05; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:still': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'deprecation': 0.16; 'design?': 0.16; 'happily': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:exists': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'least': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'raise': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'anybody': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; '2.6': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'somebody': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'our': 0.64; 'beats': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: cgi parse_qs still exists? Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 22:30:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-178-243.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.19 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1427664670 news.xs4all.nl 2860 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52472 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:88285 This has been marked for deprecation since at least 2.6 but is still in the 3.5 code base. Does anybody know if this is by accident or design? If the former I'll happily raise an issue to get it removed unless somebody beats me to it. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence