Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.023
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'args': 0.04; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'cleanly': 0.16; 'presume': 0.16; 'received:172.18.0': 0.16; 'thanks,': 0.18; 'to:name:python-list@python.org': 0.20; 'statement': 0.23; 'pass': 0.25; '8bit%:5': 0.29; 'switch': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'there': 0.35; 'ability': 0.36; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:unknown': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.63
X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true
X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=YO+FcVZrxpdWV6Mo6AkY2Rtp7tuV51ZJEd1ZQZEmJbs= c=1 sm=1 a=CRTDazI5n6YA:10 a=7PYXob_7ZXMA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=oNw28mxuUhXRB3mVwYQ4Ag==:17 a=f9ahl2qUkSgw_m9SM5gA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
From: "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com>
To: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Subject: Switch statement
Thread-Topic: Switch statement
Thread-Index: AQHOHZi/ESFVWYLgCEa6JjfGB2X4CQ==
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:16:27 +0000
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [172.18.0.200]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3155.1362925062.2939.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 37
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1362925062 news.xs4all.nl 6860 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32809
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:41016

I have a switch statement composed using a dict:=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
switch =3D {=0A=
=A0 =A0 'a': func_a,=0A=
=A0 =A0 'b':=A0func_b,=0A=
=A0 =A0 'c':=A0func_c=0A=
}=0A=
switch.get(var, default)()=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
As a result of multiple functions per choice, it migrated to:=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
switch =3D {=0A=
=A0 =A0 'a': (func_a1, func_a2),=0A=
=A0 =A0 'b': (func_b1,=A0func_b2),=0A=
=A0 =A0 'c': (func_c, )=0A=
}=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
for f in=A0switch.get(var, (default, )):=0A=
=A0 =A0 f()=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
As a result of only some of the functions now=A0requiring unique arguments,=
 I presume this=0A=
needs to be migrated to a if/else statement? Is there a way to maintain the=
 switch style with=0A=
the ability in this scenario to cleanly pass args only to some functions?=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
jlc=